ArticleDer Anaesthesist2014
[On-scene times for helicopter services. Influence of central dispatch center strategy].
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prehospital critical care dispatch: a scoping review (PHASE).Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Neuroprotective and neuroregenerative drugs after severe traumatic brain injury : A narrative review from a clinical perspective.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2024Review
- Parallel activation of helicopter and ground transportation after dispatcher identification of suspected anterior large vessel occlusion stroke in rural areas: a proof-of-concept case with modeling from the LESTOR trial.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Identification of Anterior Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke During the Emergency Call: Protocol for a Controlled, Nonrandomized Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- [Restructuring of inpatient emergency treatment : What will change?]Der Anaesthesist · 2019Review
- [Development of ground-based physician-staffed emergency missions in the city of Leipzig from 2003 to 2013].Der Anaesthesist · 2018Article
- Significant acceleration of emergency response using smartphone geolocation data and a worldwide emergency call support system.PloS one · 2018Article
- [Future of emergency medicine in Germany 2.0].Der Anaesthesist · 2017Review
- [Tracer diagnosis severe injury/polytrauma in key issue paper 2016].Der Unfallchirurg · 2016Article
- [Pressure and gases: Current guidelines on diving accidents].Der Anaesthesist · 2015Article
- [Air rescue missions at night: Data analysis of primary and secondary missions by the DRF air rescue service in 2014].Der Unfallchirurg · 2015Article
- [Acute treatment of patients with severe traumatic brain injury].Der Anaesthesist · 2015Review
- [Air rescue: current significance and practical issues].Der Anaesthesist · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have suggested that when using several emergency systems and air rescue prehospital and on-scene times are extended, depending on the dispatch strategy. Emergency medical services (EMS) in Germany are delivered by ambulances (AMB) staffed by paramedics alone or with physicians (EMD) and by helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) always staffed by both. The advantages of HEMS in countries with short transport distances and high hospital density are controversial. The best dispatching strategy for HEMS has not been determined
objectiveThe BoLuS study in the German state of Hessen was designed to evaluate the influence of dispatch strategy on prehospital times for responses involving both HEMS and EMS.
methodsRescue responses involving HEMS were prospectively evaluated in 12 regions of Hessen from July 2010 to September 2011. Although all regions had access to HEMS, only one had its own service. Data from both central dispatch centers and helicopter services were collected and combined to calculate the on-scene time (OST) and correlate it with dispatch strategy.
resultsA total of 2111 emergency interventions were evaluated. Internal medicine emergencies accounted for 42.9 % of cases and trauma for 36.7 %. Just one patient was involved in 87.9 % of rescues. Two services were involved in 65.3 % of rescues and three or more in 31.5 %. The most common dispatch categories were initial dispatch of EMS and HEMS (50.6 %), initial dispatch of EMS with later request for HEMS (19.7 %) and initial dispatch of both EMS and EMD with later request for HEMS (17.4 %). The OST for these categories were 31.0 ± 13.7 min, 43.7 ± 16.2 min and 54.6 ± 21.3 min (p < 0.01), respectively.
conclusionOST varies significantly depending on the number of EMS involved and the dispatch strategy. Sequential dispatching of ground and later HEMS wastes time. Getting an emergency physician to the scene as quickly as possible, reducing transport time to an appropriate hospital and caring for more complex emergencies are the main indications for HEMS. If HEMS appears likely to be needed, it should be dispatched immediately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24962365What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.