ReviewInternational orthopaedics2014
Nanobiotechnology and bone regeneration: a mini-review.
Review in International orthopaedics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neutrophil-Membrane Biomimetic Hollow Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Targeted Delivery of Imperatorin to Alleviate Cerebral Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury via Nrf2/ARE/Keap1 Pathway.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Article
- Nanotechnology in Orthopedic Care: Advances in Drug Delivery, Implants, and Biocompatibility Considerations.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Rational design of structure-based vaccines targeting misfolded alpha-synuclein conformers of Parkinson's disease and related disorders.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024Article
- Nanostructured Medical Devices: Regulatory Perspective and Current Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Pioneering nanomedicine in orthopedic treatment care: a review of current research and practices.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Improvement of Metal-Doped β-TCP Scaffolds for Active Bone Substitutes via Ultra-Short Laser Structuring.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A mini-review on the emerging role of nanotechnology in revolutionizing orthopedic surgery: challenges and the road ahead.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Brief review: Applications of nanocomposite in electrochemical sensor and drugs delivery.Frontiers in chemistry · 2023Review
- Recent Advances and Perspective of Nanotechnology-Based Implants for Orthopedic Applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Current Status and Perspectives of Protease Inhibitors and Their Combination with Nanosized Drug Delivery Systems for Targeted Cancer Therapy.Drug design, development and therapy · 2021Review
- Nanostructured Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Nanotechnology: the scope and potential applications in orthopedic surgery.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2018Article
- Semaphorin 3A promotes osteogenic differentiation of BMSC from type 2 diabetes mellitus rats.Journal of molecular histology · 2018Article
- Nanotechnology in orthopedics: a clinically oriented review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2018Review
- Nanomedicine for safe healing of bone trauma: Opportunities and challenges.Biomaterials · 2017Review
- Development of nanomaterials for bone-targeted drug delivery.Drug discovery today · 2017Review
- Nanoengineered implant as a new platform for regenerative nanomedicine using 3D well-organized human cell spheroids.International journal of nanomedicine · 2017Article
- Poly(acrylic acid)-regulated Synthesis of Rod-Like Calcium Carbonate Nanoparticles for Inducing the Osteogenic Differentiation of MC3T3-E1 Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016Article
- Tissue engineering and regenerative orthopaedics (TERO).International orthopaedics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to review current developments in bone tissue engineering, with special focus on the promising role of nanobiotechnology. This unique fusion between nanotechnology and biotechnology offers unprecedented possibilities in studying and modulating biological processes on a molecular and atomic scale. First we discuss the multiscale hierarchical structure of bone and its implication on the design of new scaffolds and delivery systems. Then we briefly present different types of nanostructured scaffolds, and finally we conclude with nanoparticle delivery systems and their potential use in promoting bone regeneration. This review is not meant to be exhaustive and comprehensive, but aims to highlight concepts and key advances in the field of nanobiotechnology and bone regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24962293What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.