ArticleInternational orthopaedics2014
Nonviral gene transfer to human meniscal cells. Part I: transfection analyses and cell transplantation to meniscus explants.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomedical-grade, high mannuronic acid content (BioMVM) alginate enhances the proteoglycan production of primary human meniscal fibrochondrocytes in a 3-D microenvironment.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Gene therapy approaches to regenerating the musculoskeletal system.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2015Review
- Nonviral gene transfer into human meniscal cells. Part II: effect of three-dimensional environment and overexpression of human fibroblast growth factor 2.International orthopaedics · 2014Article
- Tissue engineering and regenerative orthopaedics (TERO).International orthopaedics · 2014Article
- Explant models for meniscus metabolism, injury, repair, and healing.Connective tissue researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOur aim was to evaluate whether nonviral vectors can genetically modify primary human juvenile and adult meniscal fibrochondrocytes at low toxicity in vitro and to test the hypothesis that transfected human meniscal fibrochondrocytes transplanted into longitudinal defects and onto human medial meniscus explant cultures are capable of expressing transgene products in vitro.
methodsEighteen nonviral gene transfer systems were examined to identify the best suited method for an efficient transfection of primary cultures of juvenile and adult human meniscal fibrochondrocytes using luciferase and lacZ reporter gene constructs and then transplanted to meniscus explant cultures.
resultsGene transfer systems FuGENE 6, GeneJammer, TurboFectin 8, calcium phosphate co-precipitates and GeneJuice led to minimal toxicity in both cell types. Nanofectin 2 and JetPEI resulted in maximal luciferase activity in both cell types. Maximal transfection efficiency based on X-gal staining following lacZ gene transfer was achieved using Lipofectamine 2000, revealing a mean transfection efficiency of 8.6 % in human juvenile and of 8.4 % in adult meniscal fibrochondrocytes. Transfected, transplanted meniscal fibrochondrocytes adhered to the meniscal tissue and continued to express the transgene for at least five days following transfection.
conclusionsNonviral gene transfer systems are safe and capable of transfecting both juvenile and adult human meniscal fibrochondrocytes, which, when transplanted to meniscal tissue in vitro, permit the expression of selected transgenes to be maintained. These results are of value for combining gene therapy and cell transplantation approaches as a means to enhance meniscal repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.