Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24961715›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2014

A systematic review of the influence of occupational organophosphate pesticides exposure on neurological impairment.

Noriko Takahashi, Masahiro Hashizume

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Risk Factors for Brain Health in Agricultural Work: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Influence of Food and Beverage Companies on Retailer Marketing Strategies and Consumer Behavior.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Substance use disorders in Saudi Arabia: a scoping review.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Noriko TakahashiDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6607-5943
Masahiro HashizumeDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the published literature and to estimate whether or not there is a causal relationship between occupational exposure to organophosphate pesticides (OPs) and either neurological impairment or depressive symptoms. DATA SOURCES: EMBASE, MEDLINE, Global Health and PsycINFO (1980 to April 2014).

settingObservational studies (cross-sectional, cohort and case-control studies) with exposed and unexposed groups.

participantsPeople who occupationally use OPs for more than 1 month and their family. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Results of neurological core test batteries or depressive symptoms such as headaches, anxiety and dizziness. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

methodsAfter an extensive search of various literature databases, one author screened titles and abstracts, searched the relevant publications manually and conducted data extraction. All extracted data from the selected articles were synthesised for analysis. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale.

resultsOf the 1024 articles retrieved by database search, 24 studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected for analysis. Of the selected studies, 17 were cross-sectional and the remaining 7 were cohort and nested case-control studies. The geographical areas included in the studies were the USA (10 studies), the UK (4 studies), Africa (4 studies), Asia (3 studies), Europe (2 studies) and South America (1 study). Each of the included studies used different exposure and outcome assessments such as neurological scores and depressive symptoms, making it difficult to compare the results exactly. Most studies showed that exposed groups had poorer results than unexposed groups; however, owing to the inconsistent neurological test batteries, there was not enough pooling evidence to conduct a meta-analysis.

conclusionsThe findings of this literature review indicate that it is necessary to standardise the neurological or neuropsychological test battery and methods of measuring exposure to OPs.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNeurotoxicity SyndromesOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureOrganophosphatesPesticidesOrganophosphatesPesticidesEnvironmental Health

Identifiers

PMID24961715
PMCPMC4078784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.