Trial reportEuropean journal of heart failure2014
Spinal cord stimulation is safe and feasible in patients with advanced heart failure: early clinical experience.
Trial report in European journal of heart failure, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- The efficacy of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in heart failure management - a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Potential interference of spinal cord and sacral stimulators with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a systematic review.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Pulsed Ultrahigh Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Arrhythmia After Myocardial Infarction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Brain‑heart axis: Neurostimulation techniques in ischemic heart disease (Review).International journal of molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Neuromodulation in patients with refractory angina pectoris: a review.European heart journal open · 2023Review
- Neuromodulation devices for heart failureEuropean heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Article
- Research Opportunities in Autonomic Neural Mechanisms of Cardiopulmonary Regulation: A Report From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the National Institutes of Health Office of the Director Workshop.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2022Review
- Drivers and Risk Factors of Unplanned 30-Day Readmission Following Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2018Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsPre-clinical work suggests that upper thoracic spinal cord stimulation (SCS) may have therapeutic effects in the treatment of heart failure (HF). We therefore aim to assess the safety and feasibility of SCS in HF patients. METHODS AND
resultsA prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover pilot study was conducted in symptomatic HF patients receiving optimal medical therapy. Patients were implanted with an SCS system and randomized to an SCS-ACTIVE, delivered at 90% paraesthesia threshold, or an SCS-INACTIVE phase for 3 months, followed by a 1-month washout period and crossover to the alternative phase. The safety of SCS therapy was assessed by death and cardiac events. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) function in the presence of SCS was tested by defibrillation testing during SCS system implant and review of real-time and stored electrograms during follow-up. The efficacy of SCS therapy was assessed by changes in patient symptoms, LV function, and BNP level. Nine patients were investigated. In all cases, ICD sensing, detection, and therapy delivery were unaffected by SCS. During follow-up, one patient died and one was hospitalized for HF while in the SCS-INACTIVE phase, and two patients had HF hospitalizations during the SCS-ACTIVE phase. Symptoms were improved in the majority of patients with SCS, while markers of cardiac structure and function were, in aggregate, unchanged.
conclusionThis study shows that an SCS system can be safely implanted in patients with advanced HF and that the SCS system does not interfere with ICD function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.