Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24960661›Full record

ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2015

The Australian and New Zealand Haemostasis Registry: ten years of data on off-licence use of recombinant activated factor VII.

Amanda Zatta, Zoe Mcquilten, Rangi Kandane-Rathnayake, James Isbister, Scott Dunkley, John Mcneil, Peter Cameron, Louise Phillips

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Peripartum Haemorrhage: Haemostatic Aspects of the New German PPH Guideline.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Liver trauma: WSES position paper.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2015
    Article
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda ZattaDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Zoe McquiltenDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Rangi Kandane-RathnayakeDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Australian Haemophilia Centre Directors' Organisation, Melbourne, Australia.
James IsbisterDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Transfusion Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Scott DunkleyHaemophilia and Thrombosis Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
John McneilDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Peter CameronDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Emergency and Trauma Centre, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Louise PhillipsDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia Calembeena Consulting, Melbourne, Australia.
Monash University · AUHaemophilia Foundation Australia · AUMonash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre · AURoyal North Shore Hospital · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) has been widely used as an off-licence pan-haemostatic agent in patients with critical bleeding. However, outside the trauma setting, there is relatively little high quality evidence on the risks and benefits of this agent. The Haemostasis Registry was established to investigate the extent of use, dosing, safety and outcomes of patients after off-licence rFVIIa treatment of critical bleeding. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe Registry recruited non-haemophiliac patients treated with rFVIIa from 2000-2009 (inclusive) in Australia and New Zealand. Detailed information was gathered on patients' demographics, context of bleeding, rFVIIa administration, laboratory results, blood component and other therapies, and outcomes. Outcome measures included subjectively assessed effect of rFVIIa on bleeding (response), adverse events (thromboembolic and other) and 28-day mortality.

resultsThe registry included 3,446 cases in 3,322 patients (median [IQR] age 56 [33-70] years, 65% (n=2,147) male). Clinical indications included cardiac surgery (45%), other surgery (18%), trauma (13%), medical bleeding (6%), liver disease (6%), and obstetric haemorrhage (5%). The median [IQR] dose was 91 [72-103] μg/kg and 77% received a single dose. Reduction or cessation of bleeding was reported in 74% and 28-day survival was 71% but outcomes varied depending on clinical context. pH strongly correlated with outcome measures; 81% of patients with pH <7.1 died. Approximately 11% of patients had thromboembolic adverse events. In multivariate analysis, pH prior to administration and bleeding context were independently associated with reported response to rFVIIa and 28-day mortality. DISCUSSION: The Haemostasis Registry is the largest dataset of its kind and provides observational data on the off-licence use of rFVIIa over a 10-year period. It has been an invaluable resource for rigorously tracking adverse events and helping to inform clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAustraliaDisease-Free SurvivalFactor VIIIFactor VIIIaFemaleHemorrhageHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandRegistriesSurvival RateF8 protein, humanFactor VIIIFactor VIIIa

Identifiers

PMID24960661
PMCPMC4317095
OpenAlexW176077899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.