Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24960660›Full record

Trial reportBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2014

Flow cytometry and thromboelastography to assess platelet counts and coagulation in patients with haematological malignancies.

Alex Gatt, Fabian Bonello, Raphael Buttigieg, Samuel Debono, Patricia Brincat, Charlie Grima, Peter Gatt, Thomas Lofaro, Stefan Laspina

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alex GattPathology Department, University of Malta Medical School, Msida, Malta Haematology-Oncology Department, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
Fabian BonelloPathology Department, University of Malta Medical School, Msida, Malta.
Raphael ButtigiegPathology Department, University of Malta Medical School, Msida, Malta.
Samuel DebonoPathology Department, University of Malta Medical School, Msida, Malta.
Patricia BrincatHaematology-Oncology Department, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
Charlie GrimaPerfusion Department, Department of Surgery, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
Peter GattPerfusion Department, Department of Surgery, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
Thomas LofaroHaematology-Oncology Department, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta Haematology Department, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Stefan LaspinaHaematology-Oncology Department, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta Blood Transfusion Department, Mater Dei Hospital, Msida, Malta.
Mater Dei Hospital · MTUniversity of Malta · MTSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate platelet counts (PC) are necessary in order to follow recommendations for prophylactic platelet transfusion. We carried out a study comparing the standard way of counting platelets using a routine analyser and compared it with PC determined by flow cytometry (FC) and haemostatic data obtained with thromboelastography (TEG). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study was carried out on 24 patients with haematological malignancies, all given one adult dose of platelets. The PC was determined before and after transfusion using an automated blood cell counter and FC. Citrated, "native" whole blood TEG was carried out before and after platelet transfusion to assess global haemostasis.

resultsNo bleeding was observed in any of the subjects. Thirty-one assessments were performed in the 24 patients. The mean pre-transfusion PC were 9.8 and 13×10(9)/L with the automated counter and FC, respectively with a difference of 3.7 (p=0.0011). Excellent correlation was observed between the two counts (r=0.89; p<0.0001). Mean post-transfusion increments were 23 and 29×10(9)/L for the routine counter and FC, respectively. Using the immunological PC, patients would not have qualified for transfusion in 18.2% of cases since their PC was >20×10(9)/L. TEG showed a shortened reaction time in 69.6% of cases and a normal mean K time of 6.7 min. Only 9% had a low α angle signifying hypocoagulability. The maximum amplitude was reduced in the majority of cases but normal in 25% despite PC<20×10(9)/L. Mean activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time and fibrinogen were normal prior to transfusion. DISCUSSION: Although higher PC as assessed by FC could potentially have an impact on platelet transfusion practices, TEG was sensitive enough to detect PC<10×10(9)/L and some between 10-20×10(9)/L. Whether patients with the latter PC are more prone to bleeding remains to be verified in larger studies.

Indexed as

Blood CoagulationFlow CytometryPlatelet TransfusionThrombelastographyAdultFemaleHematologic NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlatelet Count

Identifiers

PMID24960660
PMCPMC4212027
OpenAlexW189065362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.