ReviewJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Quality of life after laparoscopic colectomy for cancer.
Review in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quality of Life (QoL) Assessment in the Patients Operated with Either Laparoscopic or an Open Aortobifemoral Bypass for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease (AIOD): 2 Years Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Vascular health and risk management · 2022Trial
- Randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic versus open surgery in transverse and descending colon cancer patients.International journal of colorectal disease · 2019Trial
- Ileocecal valve syndrome and vitamin b12 deficiency after surgery: a multicentric prospective study.Updates in surgery · 2021Article
- Prospective evaluation of the quality of life of patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer depending on the surgical technique.International journal of colorectal disease · 2019Article
- Health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors: are there differences between sporadic and hereditary patients?Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThis review focuses on health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) assessment questionnaires and the influence of various parameters on HRQoL at distinct time points after laparoscopic colectomy for cancer.
methodsA PubMed electronic database literature search was conducted.
resultsTwenty studies (7 prospective randomized, 5 nonrandomized, 2 retrospective, 1 matched, and 3 observational studies) used the following HRQoL tools: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 (8 studies), EORTC QLQ-CR38 (6 studies), EORTC QLQ-CR29 (1 study), Short Form 36 (8 studies), Gastrointestinal Quality Life Index (2 studies), EuroQoL-5D (1 study), Symptoms Distress Scale (2 studies), Quality of Life Index (2 studies), and global quality of life (1 study). Long-term beneficial effects on patient HRQoL after laparoscopic colectomy for cancer have not been clearly shown compared with "open" resections. A physical function deterioration and emotional function improvement are observed during the first month. Most patients have recovered at 12 months. Distinct HRQoL domains may be affected in older, female, and chemotherapy-treated patients. HRQoL-related parameters of pain and cosmesis have been assessed in few of the current studies on hand-assisted and single-incision laparoscopic colectomy.
conclusionStudies' heterogeneity in terms of assessment tools and time points remains as the main obstacle to establish robust conclusions. The addition of more patients and extension of the follow-up period will improve our knowledge on HRQoL changes after laparoscopic colectomy for cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.