ArticleThe Journal of urology2015
Bladder biopsy of normal-appearing mucosa is not helpful in patients with unexplained positive cytology after nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.
Article in The Journal of urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Limited Value of Bladder Wash Cytology During Follow-Up of Patients With Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.Cureus · 2023Article
- TERT C228T mutation in non-malignant bladder urothelium is associated with intravesical recurrence for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.Molecular oncology · 2020Article
- Eligibility and Radiologic Assessment in Adjuvant Clinical Trials in Bladder Cancer.JAMA oncology · 2019Article
- Bladder cancer: Normal cystoscopy, malignant cytology in NMIBC: why biopsy?Nature reviews. Urology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMalignant voided cytology with normal endoscopic evaluation represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in many patients with a history of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Bladder biopsy is often advised but its efficacy is unclear. We evaluated the usefulness of bladder biopsy in patients with unexplained positive cytology and describe recurrence patterns in this unique patient subset. MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom an institutional database we retrospectively identified patients with a history of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer and surveillance cystoscopy from 2008 to 2012 who had malignant voided urine cytology but normal cystoscopy. Patients underwent systematic bladder biopsy or cystoscopic surveillance and were followed for recurrence and progression.
resultsOf 444 patients 343 were followed with surveillance only and 101 underwent a total of 118 biopsies of normal-appearing bladder mucosa. Three biopsies (2.5%) showed carcinoma in situ and none revealed invasive carcinoma. During the median 32-month followup recurrence developed in the bladder in 194 patients (44%), in the upper tract in 24 (5%) and in the prostatic urethra in 5 (1%) while 219 (49%) had no recurrence. A previous diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma and a history of bacillus Calmette-Guérin treatment were associated with an increased recurrence risk on multivariate analysis. Recurrence rates and patterns were similar in the biopsy and surveillance groups.
conclusionsPatients with malignant cytology despite normal cystoscopy have a high recurrence rate. Biopsy of normal-appearing bladder mucosa in this setting is rarely positive and does not alter the recurrence pattern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.