Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24960360›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2014

Selection of motor programs for suppressing food intake and inducing locomotion in the Drosophila brain.

Andreas Schoofs, Sebastian Hückesfeld, Philipp Schlegel, Anton Miroschnikow, Marc Peters, Malou Zeymer, Roland Spieß, Ann-Shyn Chiang, Michael J Pankratz

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Microbiota-derived acetylcholine can promote gut motility inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Insects as a New Complex Model in Hormonal Basis of Obesity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andreas SchoofsMolecular Brain Physiology and Behavior, LIMES-Institute, University of Bonn, Germany.
Sebastian HückesfeldMolecular Brain Physiology and Behavior, LIMES-Institute, University of Bonn, Germany.
Philipp SchlegelMolecular Brain Physiology and Behavior, LIMES-Institute, University of Bonn, Germany.
Anton MiroschnikowMolecular Brain Physiology and Behavior, LIMES-Institute, University of Bonn, Germany.
Marc PetersMolecular Brain Physiology and Behavior, LIMES-Institute, University of Bonn, Germany.
Malou ZeymerMolecular Brain Physiology and Behavior, LIMES-Institute, University of Bonn, Germany.
Roland Spieß
Ann-Shyn ChiangBrain Research Center, National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan.
Michael J PankratzMolecular Brain Physiology and Behavior, LIMES-Institute, University of Bonn, Germany.
University of Bonn · DELife & Brain (Germany) · DEJena University Hospital · DENational Tsing Hua University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central mechanisms by which specific motor programs are selected to achieve meaningful behaviors are not well understood. Using electrophysiological recordings from pharyngeal nerves upon central activation of neurotransmitter-expressing cells, we show that distinct neuronal ensembles can regulate different feeding motor programs. In behavioral and electrophysiological experiments, activation of 20 neurons in the brain expressing the neuropeptide hugin, a homolog of mammalian neuromedin U, simultaneously suppressed the motor program for food intake while inducing the motor program for locomotion. Decreasing hugin neuropeptide levels in the neurons by RNAi prevented this action. Reducing the level of hugin neuronal activity alone did not have any effect on feeding or locomotion motor programs. Furthermore, use of promoter-specific constructs that labeled subsets of hugin neurons demonstrated that initiation of locomotion can be separated from modulation of its motor pattern. These results provide insights into a neural mechanism of how opposing motor programs can be selected in order to coordinate feeding and locomotive behaviors.

Indexed as

AnimalsCentral Nervous SystemFeeding BehaviorLocomotion

Identifiers

PMID24960360
PMCPMC4068981
OpenAlexW2026243569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.