Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24959876›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

"Deep" sequencing accuracy and reproducibility using Roche/454 technology for inferring co-receptor usage in HIV-1.

David J H F Knapp, Rachel A McGovern, Art F Y Poon, Xiaoyin Zhong, Dennison Chan, Luke C Swenson, Winnie Dong, P Richard Harrigan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David J H F KnappBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Rachel A McGovernBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Art F Y PoonBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Xiaoyin ZhongBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Dennison ChanBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Luke C SwensonBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Winnie DongBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
P Richard HarriganBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 200802HFE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next generation, "deep", sequencing has increasing applications both clinically and in disparate fields of research. This study investigates the accuracy and reproducibility of "deep" sequencing as applied to co-receptor prediction using the V3 loop of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1. Despite increasing use in HIV co-receptor prediction, the accuracy and reproducibility of deep sequencing technology, and the factors which can affect it, have received only a limited level of investigation. To accomplish this, repeated deep sequencing results were generated using the Roche GS-FLX (454) from a number of sources including a non-homogeneous clinical sample (N = 47 replicates over 18 deep sequencing runs), and a large clinical cohort from the MOTIVATE and A400129 studies (N = 1521). For repeated measurements of a non-homogeneous clinical sample, increasing input copy number both decreased variance in the measured proportion of non-R5 using virus (p<<0.001 and 0.02 for single replicates and triplicates respectively) and increased measured viral diversity (p<0.001; multiple measures). Detection of sequences with a mean abundance less than 1% abundance showed a 2 fold increase in median coefficient of variation (CV) in repeated measurements of a non-homogeneous clinical sample, and a 2.7 fold increase in CV in the MOTIVATE/A400129 dataset compared to sequences with ≥1% abundance. An unexpected source of error included read position, with low accuracy reads occurring more frequently towards the edge of sequencing regions (p<<0.001). Overall, the primary source of variability was sampling error caused by low input copy number/minority species prevalence, though other sources of error including sequence intrinsic, temporal, and read-position related errors were detected.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID24959876
PMCPMC4069016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.