Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24959748›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Movement dependence and layer specificity of entorhinal phase precession in two-dimensional environments.

Eric Reifenstein, Martin Stemmler, Andreas V M Herz, Richard Kempter, Susanne Schreiber

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cell-Type Specific Phase Precession in Layer II of the Medial Entorhinal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  9. State-dependencies of learning across brain scales.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eric ReifensteinInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Department of Biology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany and Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Martin StemmlerDepartment Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany; and Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Munich, Munich, Germany.
Andreas V M HerzDepartment Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany; and Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Munich, Munich, Germany.
Richard KempterInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Department of Biology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany and Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Susanne SchreiberInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Department of Biology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany and Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Munich · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a rat moves, grid cells in its entorhinal cortex (EC) discharge at multiple locations of the external world, and the firing fields of each grid cell span a hexagonal lattice. For movements on linear tracks, spikes tend to occur at successively earlier phases of the theta-band filtered local field potential during the traversal of a firing field - a phenomenon termed phase precession. The complex movement patterns observed in two-dimensional (2D) open-field environments may fundamentally alter phase precession. To study this question at the behaviorally relevant single-run level, we analyzed EC spike patterns as a function of the distance traveled by the rat along each trajectory. This analysis revealed that cells across all EC layers fire spikes that phase-precess; indeed, the rate and extent of phase precession were the same, only the correlation between spike phase and path length was weaker in EC layer III. Both slope and correlation of phase precession were surprisingly similar on linear tracks and in 2D open-field environments despite strong differences in the movement statistics, including running speed. While the phase-precession slope did not correlate with the average running speed, it did depend on specific properties of the animal's path. The longer a curving path through a grid-field in a 2D environment, the shallower was the rate of phase precession, while runs that grazed a grid field tangentially led to a steeper phase-precession slope than runs through the field center. Oscillatory interference models for grid cells do not reproduce the observed phenomena.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsMovementAlgorithmsAnimalsEntorhinal CortexModels, NeurologicalNeuronsRats

Identifiers

PMID24959748
PMCPMC4069107
OpenAlexW2038566773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.