Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24959443›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2014

Co-production of ESBL and AmpC β-Lactamases in Clinical Isolates of A. baumannii and A. lwoffii in a Tertiary Care Hospital From Northern India.

Pooja Singla, Rama Sikka, Antariksh Deeep, Deep Gagneja, Uma Chaudhary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Associations betweenMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023
    Article
  3. Molecular Characterization of Carbapenem-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Phenotypic Characterization and Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Extended-SpectrumThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Detection and genotype analysis of AmpC β-lactamase inExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pooja SinglaDemonstrator, Department of Microbiology, PT. B.D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak, India .
Rama SikkaProfessor, Department of Microbiology, PT. B.D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak, India .
Antariksh DeeepAssociate Professor, Department of Microbiology, PT. B.D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak, India .
Deep GagnejaMedical Officer, General Hospital , Sirsa, India .
Uma ChaudharySr. Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, PT. B.D. Sharma PGIMS Rohtak, India .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcinetobacter baumannii is an important cause of health care associated infections which are difficult to control and treat, because of widespread antimicrobial resistance which is possessed by this organism.

aimsThe aim of the present study was to know the prevalence of ESBLs and AmpC β-lactamases in clinical isolates of Acinetobacter spp. which were cultured from various clinical specimens by using different phenotypic methods. SETTINGS AND

designStudy was conducted over a period of one year at the Microbiology Department of a tertiary care teaching hospital. A total of 100 consecutive, non-duplicate strains of Acinetobacter species which were isolated from various clinical samples were included. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll the isolates were identified by standard microbiological procedures and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done by Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion technique. Isolates which showed reduced susceptibilities to third generation cephalosporins were tested for ESBL production by CLSI double disc synergy method and also by using sulbactam as an inhibitory agent. Isolates which showed reduced susceptibilities to cefoxitin were tested for AmpC detection by doing AmpC disc test. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: SPSS, version 17 was used to calculate p-value. If the p-value was <0.05, it was considered to be significant.

resultsOut of 100 isolates, 82 were Acinetobacter baumannii and 18 were Acinetobacter lwoffii. ESBL were mentioned in 4% of the Acinetobacter isolates and in 77% of the isolates by using clavulanic acid and sulbactam as inhibitory agents respectively. AmpC β-lactamase production was detected in 60% isolates of Acinetobacter spp. Co-production of both ESBL and AmpC enzymes were seen in 29% of the Acinetobacter strains.

conclusionFailure in detecting β-lactamases contributes to their uncontrolled spread and therapeutic failures. Hence, these β-lactamases should be detected routinely and they should be reported to clinicians in time, so that inappropriate use of antibiotics can be stopped in time.

Indexed as

AcinetobacterAmpC β-lactamasesCephalosporinsExtended spectrum β-lactamasesMulti-drug resistance

Identifiers

PMID24959443
PMCPMC4064843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.