Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24959145›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2014

Dabigatran - a continuing exemplar case history demonstrating the need for comprehensive models to optimize the utilization of new drugs.

Brian Godman, Rickard E Malmström, Eduardo Diogene, Sisira Jayathissa, Stuart McTaggart, Thomas Cars, Samantha Alvarez-Madrazo, Christoph Baumgärtel, Anna Brzezinska, Anna Bucsics and 26 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Global access to affordable direct oral anticoagulants.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The Expiry of HumiraFrontiers in pharmacology · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Brian GodmanDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge Stockholm, Sweden ; Medicines Use and Health, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde Glasgow, UK.
Rickard E MalmströmClinical Pharmacology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Solna Stockholm, Sweden.
Eduardo DiogeneClinical Pharmacology Service, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Fundació Institut Català de Farmacologia, Autonomous University of Barcelona Barcelona, Spain.
Sisira JayathissaDepartment of Medicine, Hutt Valley DHB Lower Hutt, Wellington, New Zealand.
Stuart McTaggartPublic Health and Intelligence Business Unit, NHS National Services Scotland Edinburgh, UK.
Thomas CarsDepartment of Healthcare Development, Public Healthcare Services Committee, Stockholm County Council Stockholm, Sweden ; Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University Uppsala, Sweden.
Samantha Alvarez-MadrazoMedicines Use and Health, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde Glasgow, UK.
Christoph BaumgärtelAustrian Medicines and Medical Devices Agency Wien, Austria.
Anna BrzezinskaAgency for Health Technology Assessment Warsaw, Poland.
Anna BucsicsDepartment of Finance, Faculty of Business, Economics and Statistics, University of Vienna Vienna, Austria ; Hauptverband der Österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger Vienna, Austria.
Stephen CampbellCentre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester Manchester, UK.
Irene ErikssonDepartment of Healthcare Development, Public Healthcare Services Committee, Stockholm County Council Stockholm, Sweden.
Alexander FinlaysonGreen Templeton College, University of Oxford Oxford, UK.
Jurij FürstHealth Insurance Institute Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Kristina GaruolieneMedicines Reimbursement Department, National Health Insurance Fund Vilnius, Lithuania.
Iñaki Gutiérrez-IbarluzeaBasque Office for HTA, Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs, Basque Government Basque Country, Spain.
Krystyna HvidingNorwegian Medicines Agency Oslo, Norway.
Harald HerholzKassenärztliche Vereinigung Hessen Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Roberta JoppiPharmaceutical Drug Department, Azienda Sanitaria Locale of Verona Verona, Italy.
Marija KalabaDepartment of Medicines and Pharmacoeconomics, Republic Institute for Health Insurance Belgrade, Serbia.
Ott LaiusState Agency of Medicines Tartu, Estonia.
Kamila MalinowskaDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, Public Health School Warsaw, Poland ; Drug Management Department, National Health Fund Warsaw, Poland.
Hanne B PedersenDivision of Health Systems and Public Health, Health Technologies and Pharmaceuticals, WHO Regional Office for Europe Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vanda Markovic-PekovicFaculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina ; Ministry of Health and Social Welfare Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Jutta PiessneggerHauptverband der Österreichischen Sozialversicherungsträger Vienna, Austria.
Gisbert SelkeWissenschaftliches Institut der AOK (WidO) Berlin, Germany.
Catherine SermetIRDES Paris, France.
Susan SpillaneDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin Dublin, Ireland.
Dominik TomekFaculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University and Faculty of Medicine, Slovak Medical University Bratislava, Slovakia.
Luka VončinaMinistry of Health Zagreb, Croatia.
Vera Vlahović-PalčevskiUnit for Clinical Pharmacology, University Hospital Rijeka Rijeka, Croatia.
Janet WaleIndependent Consumer Advocate, VIC Melbourne, Australia.
Magdalena WladysiukHTA Consulting Cracow, Poland.
Menno van WoerkomDutch Institute for Rational Use of Medicine Utrecht, Netherlands.
Corinne ZaraBarcelona Health Region, Catalan Health Service Barcelona, Spain.
Lars L GustafssonDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are potential conflicts between authorities and companies to fund new premium priced drugs especially where there are effectiveness, safety and/or budget concerns. Dabigatran, a new oral anticoagulant for the prevention of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF), exemplifies this issue. Whilst new effective treatments are needed, there are issues in the elderly with dabigatran due to variable drug concentrations, no known antidote and dependence on renal elimination. Published studies showed dabigatran to be cost-effective but there are budget concerns given the prevalence of AF. These concerns resulted in extensive activities pre- to post-launch to manage its introduction.

objectiveTo (i) review authority activities across countries, (ii) use the findings to develop new models to better manage the entry of new drugs, and (iii) review the implications based on post-launch activities. METHODOLOGY: (i) Descriptive review and appraisal of activities regarding dabigatran, (ii) development of guidance for key stakeholder groups through an iterative process, (iii) refining guidance following post launch studies.

resultsPlethora of activities to manage dabigatran including extensive pre-launch activities, risk sharing arrangements, prescribing restrictions and monitoring of prescribing post launch. Reimbursement has been denied in some countries due to concerns with its budget impact and/or excessive bleeding. Development of a new model and future guidance is proposed to better manage the entry of new drugs, centering on three pillars of pre-, peri-, and post-launch activities. Post-launch activities include increasing use of patient registries to monitor the safety and effectiveness of new drugs in clinical practice.

conclusionModels for introducing new drugs are essential to optimize their prescribing especially where concerns. Without such models, new drugs may be withdrawn prematurely and/or struggle for funding.

Indexed as

critical drug evaluationdabigatrandemand-side measuresmanaged introduction new medicinesregistries

Identifiers

PMID24959145
PMCPMC4050532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.