Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24958927›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2014

The legacy of diploid progenitors in allopolyploid gene expression patterns.

Richard J A Buggs, Jonathan F Wendel, Jeffrey J Doyle, Douglas E Soltis, Pamela S Soltis, Jeremy E Coate

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
19.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Diploidization in a wild rice allopolyploid is both episodic and gradual.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard J A BuggsSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK r.buggs@qmul.ac.uk.
Jonathan F WendelDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames IA 50011, USA.
Jeffrey J DoyleL. H. Bailey Hortorium, Department of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Douglas E SoltisDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Pamela S SoltisFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Jeremy E CoateDepartment of Biology, Reed College, Portland, OR 97202, USA.
Cornell University · USFlorida Museum of Natural History · USIowa State University · USQueen Mary University of London · GBReed College · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allopolyploidization (hybridization and whole-genome duplication) is a common phenomenon in plant evolution with immediate saltational effects on genome structure and gene expression. New technologies have allowed rapid progress over the past decade in our understanding of the consequences of allopolyploidy. A major question, raised by early pioneer of this field Leslie Gottlieb, concerned the extent to which gene expression differences among duplicate genes present in an allopolyploid are a legacy of expression differences that were already present in the progenitor diploid species. Addressing this question necessitates phylogenetically well-understood natural study systems, appropriate technology, availability of genomic resources and a suitable analytical framework, including a sufficiently detailed and generally accepted terminology. Here, we review these requirements and illustrate their application to a natural study system that Gottlieb worked on and recommended for this purpose: recent allopolyploids of Tragopogon (Asteraceae). We reanalyse recent data from this system within the conceptual framework of parental legacies on duplicate gene expression in allopolyploids. On a broader level, we highlight the intellectual connection between Gottlieb's phrasing of this issue and the more contemporary framework of cis- versus trans-regulation of duplicate gene expression in allopolyploid plants.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionHybridization, GeneticModels, GeneticPolyploidyGene Expression Regulation, PlantSpecies SpecificityTragopogonhybridizationpolyploidytranscriptomeswhole-genome duplication

Identifiers

PMID24958927
PMCPMC4071527
OpenAlexW2119009490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.