Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24958818›Full record

ReviewBone & joint research2014

The role of animal models in tendon research.

M W Hast, A Zuskov, L J Soslowsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bone & joint research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Grafts in tendon repair.Materials today. Bio · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A CD26Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Tendon mechanobiology in the context of tendon biofabrication.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. LeveragingFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M W HastUniversity of Pennsylvania, McKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, 424 Stemmler Hall 36th Street and Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, 19104-6081, USA.
A ZuskovUniversity of Pennsylvania, McKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, 424 Stemmler Hall 36th Street and Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, 19104-6081, USA.
L J SoslowskyUniversity of Pennsylvania, McKay Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, 424 Stemmler Hall 36th Street and Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, 19104-6081, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tendinopathy is a debilitating musculoskeletal condition which can cause significant pain and lead to complete rupture of the tendon, which often requires surgical repair. Due in part to the large spectrum of tendon pathologies, these disorders continue to be a clinical challenge. Animal models are often used in this field of research as they offer an attractive framework to examine the cascade of processes that occur throughout both tendon pathology and repair. This review discusses the structural, mechanical, and biological changes that occur throughout tendon pathology in animal models, as well as strategies for the improvement of tendon healing. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2014;3:193-202.

Indexed as

Animal ModelLiterature ReviewTendinopathyTendon

Identifiers

PMID24958818
PMCPMC4116644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.