Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24958169›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2014

Comparative analysis of the secretome from a model filarial nematode (Litomosoides sigmodontis) reveals maximal diversity in gravid female parasites.

Stuart D Armstrong, Simon A Babayan, Nathaly Lhermitte-Vallarino, Nick Gray, Dong Xia, Coralie Martin, Sujai Kumar, David W Taylor, Mark L Blaxter, Jonathan M Wastling and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Perusal of parasitic nematode 'omics in the post-genomic era.Molecular and biochemical parasitology · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Stuart D ArmstrongFrom the ‡Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK;
Simon A Babayan§Centre for Immunity, Infection & Evolution and Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK;
Nathaly Lhermitte-Vallarino¶UMR 7245 MCAM CNRS, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 75231 Paris, France;
Nick Gray§Centre for Immunity, Infection & Evolution and Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK;
Dong XiaFrom the ‡Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK;
Coralie Martin¶UMR 7245 MCAM CNRS, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 75231 Paris, France;
Sujai Kumar§Centre for Immunity, Infection & Evolution and Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK;
David W Taylor‖Division of Pathway Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK;
Mark L Blaxter§Centre for Immunity, Infection & Evolution and Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK;
Jonathan M WastlingFrom the ‡Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK; **The National Institute for Health Research, Health Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK.
Benjamin L MakepeaceFrom the ‡Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK; blm1@liverpool.ac.uk.
University of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution · GBHealth Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections at University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Filarial nematodes (superfamily Filarioidea) are responsible for an annual global health burden of ∼6.3 million disability-adjusted life-years, which represents the greatest single component of morbidity attributable to helminths affecting humans. No vaccine exists for the major filarial diseases, lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis; in part because research on protective immunity against filariae has been constrained by the inability of the human-parasitic species to complete their lifecycles in laboratory mice. However, the rodent filaria Litomosoides sigmodontis has become a popular experimental model, as BALB/c mice are fully permissive for its development and reproduction. Here, we provide a comprehensive analysis of excretory-secretory products from L. sigmodontis across five lifecycle stages and identifications of host proteins associated with first-stage larvae (microfilariae) in the blood. Applying intensity-based quantification, we determined the abundance of 302 unique excretory-secretory proteins, of which 64.6% were present in quantifiable amounts only from gravid adult female nematodes. This lifecycle stage, together with immature microfilariae, released four proteins that have not previously been evaluated as vaccine candidates: a predicted 28.5 kDa filaria-specific protein, a zonadhesin and SCO-spondin-like protein, a vitellogenin, and a protein containing six metridin-like ShK toxin domains. Female nematodes also released two proteins derived from the obligate Wolbachia symbiont. Notably, excretory-secretory products from all parasite stages contained several uncharacterized members of the transthyretin-like protein family. Furthermore, biotin labeling revealed that redox proteins and enzymes involved in purinergic signaling were enriched on the adult nematode cuticle. Comparison of the L. sigmodontis adult secretome with that of the human-infective filarial nematode Brugia malayi (reported previously in three independent published studies) identified differences that suggest a considerable underlying diversity of potential immunomodulators. The molecules identified in L. sigmodontis excretory-secretory products show promise not only for vaccination against filarial infections, but for the amelioration of allergy and autoimmune diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleFilariasisFilarioideaGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenetic VariationHelminth ProteinsMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CProteomicsSex FactorsHelminth Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24958169
PMCPMC4188984
OpenAlexW2118593506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.