Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24958086›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health : a global access science source2014

A case control study of environmental and occupational exposures associated with methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in patients admitted to a rural tertiary care hospital in a high density swine region.

Leah Schinasi, Steve Wing, Kerri L Augustino, Keith M Ramsey, Delores L Nobles, David B Richardson, Lance B Price, Maliha Aziz, Pia D M MacDonald, Jill R Stewart

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health : a global access science source, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Acquisition Risk Factors of the SCCAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Evaluation of Methicillin-ResistantInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  9. Impact of occupational exposure on human microbiota.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Leah SchinasiDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. schinasi@email.unc.edu.
Steve Wing
Kerri L Augustino
Keith M Ramsey
Delores L Nobles
David B Richardson
Lance B Price
Maliha Aziz
Pia D M MacDonald
Jill R Stewart
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USEast Carolina University · USGeorge Washington University · USVidant Medical Center · US

Funding

UNC CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE AWARD: BPCAUL1RR025747 · NCRR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RUNGE, MARSCHALL S. · 2008 to 2011
$44.6M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR025747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDistinct strains of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have been identified on livestock and livestock workers. Industrial food animal production may be an important environmental reservoir for human carriage of these pathogenic bacteria. The objective of this study was to investigate environmental and occupational exposures associated with nasal carriage of MRSA in patients hospitalized at Vidant Medical Center, a tertiary hospital serving a region with intensive livestock production in eastern North Carolina.

methodsMRSA nasal carriage was identified via nasal swabs collected within 24 hours of hospital admission. MRSA carriers (cases) were gender and age matched to non-carriers (controls). Participants were interviewed about recent environmental and occupational exposures. Home addresses were geocoded and publicly available data were used to estimate the density of swine in residential census block groups of residence. Conditional logistic regression models were used to derive odds ratio (OR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Presence of the scn gene in MRSA isolates was assessed. In addition, multi locus sequence typing (MLST) of the MRSA isolates was performed, and the Diversilab® system was used to match the isolates to USA pulsed field gel electrophoresis types.

resultsFrom July - December 2011, 117 cases and 119 controls were enrolled. A higher proportion of controls than cases were current workforce members (41.2% vs. 31.6%) Cases had a higher odds of living in census block groups with medium densities of swine (OR: 4.76, 95% CI: 1.36-16.69) and of reporting the ability to smell odor from a farm with animals when they were home (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 0.80-2.86). Of 49 culture positive MRSA isolates, all were scn positive. Twenty-two isolates belonged to clonal complex 5.

conclusionsAbsence of livestock workers in this study precluded evaluation of occupational exposures. Higher odds of MRSA in medium swine density areas could reflect environmental exposure to swine or poultry.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnimalsBacterial ProteinsCarrier StateCase-Control StudiesDNA, BacterialEnvironmental ExposureFemaleHospitalizationHospitals, RuralHospitals, TeachingHumansMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusBacterial ProteinsDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID24958086
PMCPMC4083368
OpenAlexW2151172176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.