Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24958025›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2014

A testing strategy to predict risk for drug-induced liver injury in humans using high-content screen assays and the 'rule-of-two' model.

Minjun Chen, Chun-Wei Tung, Qiang Shi, Lei Guo, Leming Shi, Hong Fang, Jürgen Borlak, Weida Tong

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Integration of microphysiological systems with computational and digital twin modeling for pharmaceutical development: a systematic review.Journal of pharmacy & pharmaceutical sciences : a publication of the Canadian Society for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe canadienne des sciences pharmaceutiques · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Randomized phase 2a trial assessing a novel septin molecular glue in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. In silico modeling-based new alternative methods to predict drug and herb-induced liver injury: A review.Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Intense bitterness of molecules: Machine learning for expediting drug discovery.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Drug-induced liver injury: Do we know everything?World journal of hepatology · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Minjun ChenDivision of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR, 72079, USA.
Chun-Wei Tung
Qiang Shi
Lei Guo
Leming Shi
Hong Fang
Jürgen Borlak
Weida Tong
National Center for Toxicological Research · USUnited States Food and Drug Administration · USFudan University · CNMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

Intramural FDA HHS FD999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major cause of drug failures in both the preclinical and clinical phase. Consequently, improving prediction of DILI at an early stage of drug discovery will reduce the potential failures in the subsequent drug development program. In this regard, high-content screening (HCS) assays are considered as a promising strategy for the study of DILI; however, the predictive performance of HCS assays is frequently insufficient. In the present study, a new testing strategy was developed to improve DILI prediction by employing in vitro assays that was combined with the RO2 model (i.e., 'rule-of-two' defined by daily dose ≥100 mg/day & logP ≥3). The RO2 model was derived from the observation that high daily doses and lipophilicity of an oral medication were associated with significant DILI risk in humans. In the developed testing strategy, the RO2 model was used for the rational selection of candidates for HCS assays, and only the negatives predicted by the RO2 model were further investigated by HCS. Subsequently, the effects of drug treatment on cell loss, nuclear size, DNA damage/fragmentation, apoptosis, lysosomal mass, mitochondrial membrane potential, and steatosis were studied in cultures of primary rat hepatocytes. Using a set of 70 drugs with clear evidence of clinically relevant DILI, the testing strategy improved the accuracies by 10 % and reduced the number of drugs requiring experimental assessment by approximately 20 %, as compared to the HCS assay alone. Moreover, the testing strategy was further validated by including published data (Cosgrove et al. in Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 237:317-330, 2009) on drug-cytokine-induced hepatotoxicity, which improved the accuracies by 7 %. Taken collectively, the proposed testing strategy can significantly improve the prediction of in vitro assays for detecting DILI liability in an early drug discovery phase.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAdministration, OralAnimalsChemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHepatocytesHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansMalePharmaceutical PreparationsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRiskPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID24958025
PMCPMC5753582
OpenAlexW2055044285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.