Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24957978›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2014

Modelling the potential population impact and cost-effectiveness of self-testing for HIV: evaluation of data requirements.

Valentina Cambiano, Sue Napierala Mavedzenge, Andrew Phillips

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06270160 (Tushirikiane-4-Uthabiti), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06270160 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Tushirikiane-4-Uthabiti (Supporting Each Other For Resilience)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TorontoRan2024 to 2024Enrolled432ConditionsFinancial Stress, Social Functioning, Social SkillsArmsHIVST, mHealth, Creating Futures Livelihoods program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. The HIV self-testing debate: where do we stand?BMC international health and human rights · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Potential for HIV Self-testing in Iran.International journal of preventive medicine · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Valentina CambianoResearch Department of Infection & Population Health, UCL, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK, v.cambiano@ucl.ac.uk.
Sue Napierala Mavedzenge
Andrew Phillips

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HIV testing uptake has increased dramatically in recent years in resource limited settings. Nevertheless, over 50% of the people living with HIV are still unaware of their status. HIV self-testing (HIVST) is a potential new approach to facilitate further uptake of testing which requires consideration, taking into account economic factors. Mathematical models and associated economic analysis can provide useful assistance in decision-making processes, offering insight, in this case, into the potential long-term impact at a population level and the price-point at which free or subsidized HIVST would be cost-effective in a given setting. However, models are based on assumptions, and if the required data are sparse or limited, this uncertainty will be reflected in the results from mathematical models. The aim of this paper is to describe the issues encountered in modeling the cost-effectiveness of introducing HIVST, to indicate the evidence needed to support various modeling assumptions, and thus which data on HIVST would be most beneficial to collect.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisDecision MakingFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsHIV InfectionsHumansMass ScreeningModels, TheoreticalQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRisk Reduction BehaviorSelf CareSensitivity and SpecificitySexual Behavior

Identifiers

PMID24957978
PMCPMC4094791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.