Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24957923›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2014

Modeling the biomechanics of swine mastication--an inverse dynamics approach.

Ehsan Basafa, Ryan J Murphy, Chad R Gordon, Mehran Armand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ehsan BasafaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, USA. Electronic address: basafa@jhu.edu.
Ryan J MurphyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, USA; Research and Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, USA.
Chad R GordonDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, USA; Facial Transplant Program, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, USA.
Mehran ArmandDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, USA; Research and Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, USA.
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR001079 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2013 to 2017
$60.1M
Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000424 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2012 to 2012
$6.0M
Computer-Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery with Intra-Operative Biomechanical GuidanceR01EB006839 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ARMAND, MEHRAN · 2007 to 2010
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000424NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000424-06NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001079NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel reconstructive alternative for patients with severe facial structural deformity is Le Fort-based, face-jaw-teeth transplantation (FJTT). To date, however, only ten surgeries have included underlying skeletal and jaw-teeth components, all yielding sub-optimal results and a need for a subsequent revision surgery, due to size mismatch and lack of precise planning. Numerous studies have proven swine to be appropriate candidates for translational studies including pre-operative planning of transplantation. An important aspect of planning FJTT is determining the optimal muscle attachment sites on the recipient's jaw, which requires a clear understanding of mastication and bite mechanics in relation to the new donated upper and/or lower jaw. A segmented CT scan coupled with data taken from literature defined a biomechanical model of mandible and jaw muscles of a swine. The model was driven using tracked motion and external force data of one cycle of chewing published earlier, and predicted the muscle activation patterns as well as temporomandibular joint (TMJ) reaction forces and condylar motions. Two methods, polynomial and min/max optimization, were used for solving the muscle recruitment problem. Similar performances were observed between the two methods. On average, there was a mean absolute error (MAE) of <0.08 between the predicted and measured activation levels of all muscles, and an MAE of <7 N for TMJ reaction forces. Simulated activations qualitatively followed the same patterns as the reference data and there was very good agreement for simulated TMJ forces. The polynomial optimization produced a smoother output, suggesting that it is more suitable for studying such motions. Average MAE for condylar motion was 1.2mm, which reduced to 0.37 mm when the input incisor motion was scaled to reflect the possible size mismatch between the current and original swine models. Results support the hypothesis that the model can be used for planning of facial transplantation.

Indexed as

Models, AnatomicAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaJawMandibleMasticationMuscle, SkeletalPlastic Surgery ProceduresSwineTemporomandibular JointCraniomaxillofacial SurgeryInverse dynamicsJaw biomechanicsSwine mastication

Identifiers

PMID24957923
PMCPMC4125472
OpenAlexW2095971474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.