ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2014
Advances in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.
Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03517150 (Efficiency of Intraoral Appliance in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Obese Class III), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficiency of Intraoral Appliance in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Obese Class III
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of a Decision Support System for Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Nonlinear Analysis of Respiratory Signals.PloS one · 2016Trial
- Adherence of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome patients to positive airway pressure therapy - 10-year follow-up.Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia · 2022Article
- Mandibular positioning techniques to improve sleep quality in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: current perspectives.Nature and science of sleep · 2018Review
- Pharyngolateral ferromagnetic prosthesis (PFP) for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2015Article
- Side effects of intraoral devices for OSAS treatment.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementThis article focuses on the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), using the most recent available data. The first choice of treatment for patients with moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), which was first described in 1981 (Sullivan et al. Lancet 1(8225):862-5, 1981) and works by splinting the airway open to facilitate proper airflow. For patients with mild OSA, other treatments may be considered including positional therapy, weight loss, or oral appliances. Oral appliances are continuing to become more mainstream, and may be a reasonable first-line treatment even for some patients with moderate OSA, such as those who cannot tolerate or do not want to use CPAP. Some evidence suggests that adherence to mandibular advancement devices (MADs), a type of oral appliance, may be superior to that of CPAP. Recent evidence has suggested that the MAD may be similar to CPAP in preventing cardiovascular mortality in OSA, though objective measurement of MAD adherence was not available in the study. Objective adherence monitors are now available for oral appliances and should prove valuable for clinicians. Pharmacotherapy has not been shown to be significantly effective in the treatment of OSA and should be considered as an adjunctive treatment class, though some emerging evidence may support pharmacotherapy for specific purposes, such as acetazolamide for high-altitude travelers and zonisamide for weight loss. Upper airway surgical intervention remains a second- or third-line treatment class for moderate to severe OSA, though multiple case series of maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) have shown considerable, statistically significant improvements in AHI. Weight loss should always be recommended for patients with OSA who are overweight or obese, as weight loss may result in improvement in OSA. Bariatric operations are effective for obesity and are reasonable considerations for obese patients, although a recent randomized controlled trial found that bariatric intervention failed to achieve superiority over conventional weight loss therapy in terms of apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) reduction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.