Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24957617›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2014

Analysis of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium variable-number tandem-repeat data for public health investigation based on measured mutation rates and whole-genome sequence comparisons.

Karolina Dimovski, Hanwei Cao, Odilia L C Wijburg, Richard A Strugnell, Radha K Mantena, Margaret Whipp, Geoff Hogg, Kathryn E Holt

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Invasive non-typhoidalFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  3. Intestinal carriage of invasive non-typhoidalFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Rise and fall of outbreak-specific clone inside endemic pulsotype ofEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Phenotypic and Genotypic Eligible Methods forFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karolina DimovskiMicrobiological Diagnostic Unit Public Health Laboratory, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Hanwei CaoDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Odilia L C WijburgDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Richard A StrugnellDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Radha K MantenaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Margaret WhippMicrobiological Diagnostic Unit Public Health Laboratory, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Geoff HoggMicrobiological Diagnostic Unit Public Health Laboratory, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Kathryn E HoltDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia kholt@unimelb.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Variable-number tandem repeats (VNTRs) mutate rapidly and can be useful markers for genotyping. While multilocus VNTR analysis (MLVA) is increasingly used in the detection and investigation of food-borne outbreaks caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) and other bacterial pathogens, MLVA data analysis usually relies on simple clustering approaches that may lead to incorrect interpretations. Here, we estimated the rates of copy number change at each of the five loci commonly used for S. Typhimurium MLVA, during in vitro and in vivo passage. We found that loci STTR5, STTR6, and STTR10 changed during passage but STTR3 and STTR9 did not. Relative rates of change were consistent across in vitro and in vivo growth and could be accurately estimated from diversity measures of natural variation observed during large outbreaks. Using a set of 203 isolates from a series of linked outbreaks and whole-genome sequencing of 12 representative isolates, we assessed the accuracy and utility of several alternative methods for analyzing and interpreting S. Typhimurium MLVA data. We show that eBURST analysis was accurate and informative. For construction of MLVA-based trees, a novel distance metric, based on the geometric model of VNTR evolution coupled with locus-specific weights, performed better than the commonly used simple or categorical distance metrics. The data suggest that, for the purpose of identifying potential transmission clusters for further investigation, isolates whose profiles differ at one of the rapidly changing STTR5, STTR6, and STTR10 loci should be collapsed into the same cluster.

Indexed as

Cluster AnalysisMinisatellite RepeatsMutation RateDNA, BacterialGenome, BacterialGenotypeMolecular EpidemiologyMolecular TypingSalmonella InfectionsSalmonella typhimuriumDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID24957617
PMCPMC4135637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.