Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24957360›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2014

Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision: a pilot study.

S Atallah, B Martin-Perez, J Pinan, F Quinteros, H Schoonyoung, M Albert, S Larach

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04573738 (Safety and Feasibility Study of Robotic Assisted Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04573738 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Feasibility Study of Robotic Assisted Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorThird Military Medical UniversityRan2017 to 2021Enrolled13ConditionsRectal Cancer, Perioperative ComplicationArmsRobotic assisted transanal total mesorectal excision, Laparoscopic assisted transanal total mesorectal excision
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision: Is the future now?World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Robotics Total Mesorectal Excision Up To the Minute.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2020
    Review
  10. Future Directions.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. [Minimally invasive approaches for transanal surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S AtallahFlorida Hospital, Winter Park, FL, USA, atallah@post.harvard.edu.
B Martin-Perez
J Pinan
F Quinteros
H Schoonyoung
M Albert
S Larach
AdventHealth Orlando · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe introduction of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) in 2009 allowed colorectal surgeons to approach transanal access with a different perspective. This has lead to the development of TAMIS for total mesorectal excision (TME). We have previously described robotic transanal TME and here report our initial experience with the first three human cases performed at a single institution.

methodsThree patients with distal rectal cancer were selective to undergo robotic transanal TME. All resections were carried out with intent to cure; they were performed by a single attending colorectal surgeon over an 11-month period.

resultsThree patients underwent robotic transanal TME. The average age was 45 years (range 26-59) with mean BMI of 32 kg/m(2) (range 21-38.5). The average tumor size was 2.5 cm. All lesions were located in the distal 5 cm of the rectum. In each case, the distal and circumferential resection margins were free of tumor. The resection quality of the mesorectal envelope was Grade I and Grade II. There was no major morbidity or mortality on short-term follow-up.

conclusionsRobotic transanal TME is a new modality for en bloc rectal cancer surgery, and the technique is feasible. Further study is necessary to assess the benefit of this novel approach.

Indexed as

AdultAnal CanalColectomyEquipment DesignFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryPilot ProjectsRectal NeoplasmsRectumRetrospective StudiesRobotics

Identifiers

PMID24957360
OpenAlexW2011288405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.