Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24957256›Full record

Trial reportGastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association2015

Health utility of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) after failure of imatinib and sunitinib: findings from GRID, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study of regorafenib versus placebo.

Chris D Poole, Mark P Connolly, Jane Chang, Craig J Currie

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01271712 (A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Study of Regorafenib Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care for Subjects With Metastatic and/or Unresectable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01271712 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Study of Regorafenib Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Placebo Plus Best Supportive Care for Subjects With Metastatic and/or Unresectable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST) Whose Disease Has Progressed Despite Prior Treatment With at Least Imatinib and Sunitinib

TypeinterventionalSponsorBayerRan2011 to 2019Enrolled199ConditionsGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsArmsRegorafenib (Stivarga, BAY73-4506), Placebo, Best supportive care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Chris D PooleInstitute of Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.
Mark P Connolly
Jane Chang
Craig J Currie
Cardiff University · GBBayer (United States) · USUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this analysis we report patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) refractory to imatinib and sunitinib therapy as derived from the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) for progression-free (PF) and progressive disease health status.

methodsData were analyzed from a phase III trial conducted at 57 hospitals in 17 countries (trial registration number, NCT01271712). Patients with advanced GIST were randomized (2:1) to receive blinded treatment using oral regorafenib 160 mg daily or placebo, plus best supportive care (BSC) in both groups, for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle. EQ-5D-3L was administered on day 1 of each cycle before contact with their physician and before any study-related procedures. The effect of disease progression on the utility of EQ-5D was tested with paired-samples comparison and general linear mixed modeling (GLMM).

resultsOne hundred and eighty five patients [93 % of the intention-to-treat (ITT) population] completed 803 EQ-5D questionnaires: 77.7 % in progression-free (PF) state, 6.5 % at progression, 13.9 % following first progression, and 1.9 % after second progression. Mean baseline utility was 0.767 (SD 0.221) with no significant between-group differences for active treatment and BSC. The first post-progression health state was 0.647 (SD 0.343), suggesting significantly impaired health-related quality of life after confirmed disease progression showed a decrease of -0.120 (paired samples t test, p = 0.001). GLMM showed no effect of study treatment or cycle number on utility.

conclusionsWe demonstrate a significant and clinically meaningful difference in health state utility values between PF and progression. Utility values remained stable over successive regorafenib cycles after controlling for disease status and treatment type.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDisease-Free SurvivalDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansImatinib MesylateIndolesMaleMiddle AgedPhenylurea CompoundsPlacebo EffectPyridinesPyrrolesAntineoplastic AgentsImatinib MesylateIndolesPhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesPyrrolesregorafenibSunitinib

Identifiers

PMID24957256
PMCPMC4511071
OpenAlexW2122323101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.