Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24957014›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2014

Modulation of activity of known cytotoxic ruthenium(III) compound (KP418) with hampered transmembrane transport in electrochemotherapy in vitro and in vivo.

Rosana Hudej, Damijan Miklavcic, Maja Cemazar, Vesna Todorovic, Gregor Sersa, Alberta Bergamo, Gianni Sava, Anze Martincic, Janez Scancar, Bernhard K Keppler and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Transplantable Subcutaneous Tumor Models.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Radiology and oncology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Rosana HudejFaculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Damijan Miklavcic
Maja Cemazar
Vesna Todorovic
Gregor Sersa
Alberta Bergamo
Gianni Sava
Anze Martincic
Janez Scancar
Bernhard K Keppler
Iztok Turel
Institute of Oncology Ljubljana · SIJožef Stefan Institute · SIUniversity of Ljubljana · SIBIA Separations (Slovenia) · SIUniversity of Trieste · ITUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To increase electrochemotherapy (ECT) applicability, the effectiveness of new drugs is being tested in combination with electroporation. Among them two ruthenium(III) compounds, (imH)[trans-RuCl4(im)(DMSO-S)] (NAMI-A) and Na[trans-RuCl4(ind)2] (KP1339), proved to possess increased antitumor effectiveness when combined with electroporation. The objective of our experimental work was to determine influence of electroporation on the cytotoxic and antitumor effect of a ruthenium(III) compound with hampered transmembrane transport, (imH)[trans-RuCl4(im)2] (KP418) in vitro and in vivo and to determine changes in metastatic potential of cells after ECT with KP418 in vitro. In addition, platinum compound cisplatin (CDDP) and ruthenium(III) compound NAMI-A were included in the experiments as reference compounds. Our results show that electroporation leads to increased cellular accumulation and cytotoxicity of KP418 in murine melanoma cell lines with low and high metastatic potential, B16-F1 and B16-F10, but not in murine fibrosarcoma cell line SA-1 in vitro which is probably due to variable effectiveness of ECT in different cell lines and tumors. Electroporation does not potentiate the cytotoxicity of KP418 as prominently as the cytotoxicity of CDDP. We also showed that the metastatic potential of cells which survived ECT with KP418 or NAMI-A does not change in vitro: resistance to detachment, invasiveness, and re-adhesion of cells after ECT is not affected. Experiments in murine tumor models B16-F1 and SA-1 showed that ECT with KP418 does not have any antitumor effect while ECT with CDDP induces significant dose-dependent tumor growth delay in the two tumor models used in vivo.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiological TransportCell Line, TumorCell MembraneElectrochemotherapyElectroporationFibrosarcomaIn Vitro TechniquesMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceOrganometallic CompoundsRutheniumAntineoplastic Agentsimidazolium tetrachlorobis(1H-imidazole)ruthenate(III)Organometallic CompoundsRuthenium

Identifiers

PMID24957014
OpenAlexW2098941975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.