Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24956581›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2014

Home care technology through an ability expectation lens.

Gregor Wolbring, Bonnie Lashewicz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06270420 (Treatment Improvement With the Use of Innovative Technologies and Robotics in Rehabilitation Process), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06270420 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Treatment Improvement With the Use of Innovative Technologies and Robotics in Rehabilitation Process: Observational Longitudinal Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorIRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRan2023 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsNeurological Disease, Motor DisordersArmsTechnological Motor Rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Specialist Bibliographic Databases.Journal of Korean medical science · 2016
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gregor WolbringCommunity Rehabilitation and Disability Studies, Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. gwolbrin@ucalgary.ca.
Bonnie Lashewicz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Home care is on the rise, and its delivery is increasingly reliant on an expanding variety of health technologies ranging from computers to telephone "health apps" to social robots. These technologies are most often predicated on expectations that people in their homes (1) can actively interact with these technologies and (2) are willing to submit to the action of the technology in their home. Our purpose is to use an "ability expectations" lens to bring together, and provide some synthesis of, the types of utility and disadvantages that can arise for people with disabilities in relation to home care technology development and use. We searched the academic databases Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO ALL, IEEE Xplore, and Compendex to collect articles that had the term "home care technology" in the abstract or as a topic (in the case of Web of Science). We also used our background knowledge and related academic literature pertaining to self-diagnosis, health monitoring, companionship, health information gathering, and care. We examined background articles and articles collected through our home care technology search in terms of ability expectations assumed in the presentation of home care technologies, or discussed in relation to home care technologies. While advances in health care support are made possible through emerging technologies, we urge critical examination of such technologies in terms of implications for the rights and dignity of people with diverse abilities. Specifically, we see potential for technologies to result in new forms of exclusion and powerlessness. Ableism influences choices made by funders, policy makers, and the public in the development and use of home health technologies and impacts how people with disabilities are served and how useful health support technologies will be for them. We urge continued critical examination of technology development and use according to ability expectations, and we recommend increasing incorporation of participatory design processes to counteract potential for health support technology to render people with disabilities technologically excluded and powerless.

Indexed as

Biomedical TechnologyHome Care ServicesPersons with DisabilitiesActivities of Daily LivingHumansRoboticsSelf Careability expectationableismhealth care technologyhealth information gatheringhome carehome care technologyparticipatory designpeople with disabilitiessensor devices and platformssocial robotics

Identifiers

PMID24956581
PMCPMC4090376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.