ArticlePharmacogenomics2014
Replication of SULT4A1-1 as a pharmacogenetic marker of olanzapine response and evidence of lower weight gain in the high response group.
Article in Pharmacogenomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Utility and Implementation of Pharmacogenomics for the Personalisation of Antipsychotic Treatments.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Neurosteroid Actions in Memory and Neurologic/Neuropsychiatric Disorders.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimAntipsychotic efficacy biomarkers have the potential to improve outcomes in psychotic patients. This study examined the effect of SULT4A1-1 haplotype status (rs2285162 [A]-rs2285167 [G]) on olanzapine response. PATIENTS &
methodsWe evaluated 87 olanzapine treated subjects from Phases 1, 1B and 2 of the CATIE trial for the impact of SULT4A1-1 status on change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score using two models of response. We also examined weight change.
resultsSULT4A1-1-positive status correlated with superior olanzapine response in Phase 1 (p = 0.004 for model 1 and p = 0.001 for model 2) and Phases 1B/2 (p = 0.05 for model 1 and p = 0.007 for model 2). SULT4A1-1-positive subjects gained significantly less weight per month on olanzapine, 0.15 lbs, than did SULT4A1-1-negative subjects, 2.27 lbs (p = 0.04).
conclusionThis study provides a second replication of superior olanzapine response in SULT4A1-1-positive subjects compared with SULT4A1-1-negative subjects. SULT4A1-1-positive subjects treated with olanzapine also gained less weight than SULT4A1-1-negative subjects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.