Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24956084›Full record

ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2013

Keeping an eye on decellularized corneas: a review of methods, characterization and applications.

Samantha L Wilson, Laura E Sidney, Siobhán E Dunphy, James B Rose, Andrew Hopkinson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Focus on seed cells: stem cells in 3D bioprinting of corneal grafts.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. From waste to wealth: Repurposing slaughterhouse waste for xenotransplantation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha L WilsonDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. samantha.wilson@nottingham.ac.uk.
Laura E SidneyDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. laura.sidney@nottingham.ac.uk.
Siobhán E DunphyDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. paxsd2@nottingham.ac.uk.
James B RoseDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. paxjr@nottingham.ac.uk.
Andrew HopkinsonDivision of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. andrew.hopkinson@nottingham.ac.uk.
University of Nottingham · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The worldwide limited availability of suitable corneal donor tissue has led to the development of alternatives, including keratoprostheses (Kpros) and tissue engineered (TE) constructs. Despite advances in bioscaffold design, there is yet to be a corneal equivalent that effectively mimics both the native tissue ultrastructure and biomechanical properties. Human decellularized corneas (DCs) could offer a safe, sustainable source of corneal tissue, increasing the donor pool and potentially reducing the risk of immune rejection after corneal graft surgery. Appropriate, human-specific, decellularization techniques and high-resolution, non-destructive analysis systems are required to ensure reproducible outputs can be achieved. If robust treatment and characterization processes can be developed, DCs could offer a supplement to the donor corneal pool, alongside superior cell culture systems for pharmacology, toxicology and drug discovery studies.

Identifiers

PMID24956084
PMCPMC4030906
OpenAlexW2149410257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.