ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2010
Calcium orthophosphates as bioceramics: state of the art.
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in TCP-Modified PMMA Bone Cements: Relating Microstructure to Mechanical, Biological and Functional Performance-Systematic Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Phosphorus and Potassium Mobilization from Rock-Derived Mineral Sources Using Bacteria and Microalgae: A Review.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Stimuli-Responsive Piezoelectric Scaffold as an AdvancedACS omega · 2026Article
- Selenite-Doped β‑TCP Powders with Improved Biological Properties: Microwave-Assisted Synthesis and Detailed Characterization.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Image-guided in vivo evaluation and comparison of bone-targeting peptides for therapeutic intervention.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Article
- The Effect of Various Implant Coatings on Bone Formation and Cell Adhesion-Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2025Article
- Impact of the Applied Electrode System on Properties of Electrodeposited Calcium Phosphate Coatings.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Calcium Phosphates: A Key to Next-Generation In Vitro Bone Modeling.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Review
- Personalized bioceramic grafts for craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration.International journal of oral science · 2024Review
- Review
- Awareness for artifacts in fluorescence microscopy of β-TCP.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- Octacalcium phosphate, a promising bone substitute material: a narrative review.Journal of Yeungnam medical science · 2024Article
- Synthetic Calcium-Phosphate Materials for Bone Grafting.Polymers · 2023Review
- Reconstruction of Load-Bearing Segmental Bone Defects Using Carbonate Apatite Honeycomb Blocks.ACS materials Au · 2023Article
- Biomechanical Characteristics and Analysis Approaches of Bone and Bone Substitute Materials.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Bioactive Inorganic Materials for Dental Applications: A Narrative Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Histomorphometric assessment of implant coated with mixture of nano-alumina and fluorapatite in rabbits.The Saudi dental journal · 2021Article
- Signaling Pathway and Transcriptional Regulation in Osteoblasts during Bone Healing: Direct Involvement of Hydroxyapatite as a Biomaterial.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Boron-doped Biphasic Hydroxyapatite/β-Tricalcium Phosphate for Bone Tissue Engineering.Biological trace element research · 2021Article
- 3D Plotting of Silica/Collagen Xerogel Granules in an Alginate Matrix for Tissue-Engineered Bone Implants.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the late 1960s, much interest was raised in regard to biomedical applications of various ceramic materials. A little bit later, such materials were named bioceramics. This review is limited to bioceramics prepared from calcium orthophosphates only, which belong to the categories of bioactive and bioresorbable compounds. There have been a number of important advances in this field during the past 30-40 years. Namely, by structural and compositional control, it became possible to choose whether calcium orthophosphate bioceramics were biologically stable once incorporated within the skeletal structure or whether they were resorbed over time. At the turn of the millennium, a new concept of calcium orthophosphate bioceramics-which is able to promote regeneration of bones-was developed. Presently, calcium orthophosphate bioceramics are available in the form of particulates, blocks, cements, coatings, customized designs for specific applications and as injectable composites in a polymer carrier. Current biomedical applications include artificial replacements for hips, knees, teeth, tendons and ligaments, as well as repair for periodontal disease, maxillofacial reconstruction, augmentation and stabilization of the jawbone, spinal fusion and bone fillers after tumor surgery. Exploratory studies demonstrate potential applications of calcium orthophosphate bioceramics as scaffolds, drug delivery systems, as well as carriers of growth factors, bioactive peptides and/or various types of cells for tissue engineering purposes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.