Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24955376›Full record

ReviewJournal of immunology research2014

The "Trojan Horse" approach to tumor immunotherapy: targeting the tumor microenvironment.

Delia Nelson, Scott Fisher, Bruce Robinson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of immunology research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Advancing glioblastoma therapy with surface-modified nanoparticles.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Development of a TNF-α-mediated Trojan Horse for bacteria-based cancer therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Delia NelsonSchool of Biomedical Sciences, CHIRI Biosciences Research Precinct, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia.
Scott FisherNational Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, UWA School of Medicine and Pharmacology, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Perth, WA, Australia.
Bruce RobinsonNational Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, UWA School of Medicine and Pharmacology, Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research, QEII Medical Centre, Perth, WA, Australia.
Curtin University · AUHarry Perkins Institute of Medical Research · AUQueen Elizabeth II Medical Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most anticancer therapies including immunotherapies are given systemically; yet therapies given directly into tumors may be more effective, particularly those that overcome natural suppressive factors in the tumor microenvironment. The "Trojan Horse" approach of intratumoural delivery aims to promote immune-mediated destruction by inducing microenvironmental changes within the tumour at the same time as avoiding the systemic toxicity that is often associated with more "full frontal" treatments such as transfer of large numbers of laboratory-expanded tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes or large intravenous doses of cytokine. Numerous studies have demonstrated that intratumoural therapy has the capacity to minimizing local suppression, inducing sufficient "dangerous" tumor cell death to cross-prime strong immune responses, and rending tumor blood vessels amenable to immune cell traffic to induce effector cell changes in secondary lymphoid organs. However, the key to its success is the design of a sound rational approach based on evidence. There is compelling preclinical data for local immunotherapy approaches in tumor immunology. This review summarises how immune events within a tumour can be modified by local approaches, how this can affect systemic antitumor immunity such that distal sites are attacked, and what approaches have been proven most successful so far in animals and patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalCD40 AntigensCell MovementClinical Trials as TopicCytokinesHumansImmunomodulationImmunotherapyInjections, IntralesionalNeoplasmsT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicToll-Like ReceptorsTumor MicroenvironmentAntibodies, MonoclonalCD40 AntigensCytokinesToll-Like Receptors

Identifiers

PMID24955376
PMCPMC4052171
OpenAlexW2132648369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.