Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24955346›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Safety characterization and antimicrobial properties of kefir-isolated Lactobacillus kefiri.

Paula Carasi, Mariángeles Díaz, Silvia M Racedo, Graciela De Antoni, María C Urdaci, María de los Angeles Serradell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Functional evaluation of synbiotic combination ofCurrent research in food science · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Effect ofNutrients · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Enhanced probiotic potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Kefir and Its Biological Activities.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  15. 3 Biotech · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Evaluation of lactic acid bacteria isolated from poultry feces as potential probiotic and itsVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paula CarasiCátedra de Microbiología, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, de La Plata, 47 y 115 s/n, CP, 1900 La Plata, Argentina.
Mariángeles DíazCátedra de Microbiología, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, de La Plata, 47 y 115 s/n, CP, 1900 La Plata, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-2343-5915
Silvia M RacedoLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Biochimie Appliquée (LBMA), Université de Bordeaux, UMR 5248, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, 1 Cours du Général de Gaulle, 33175 Gradignan, France.
Graciela De AntoniCátedra de Microbiología, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, de La Plata, 47 y 115 s/n, CP, 1900 La Plata, Argentina.
María C UrdaciLaboratoire de Microbiologie et Biochimie Appliquée (LBMA), Université de Bordeaux, UMR 5248, Bordeaux Sciences Agro, 1 Cours du Général de Gaulle, 33175 Gradignan, France.
María de los Angeles SerradellCátedra de Microbiología, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, de La Plata, 47 y 115 s/n, CP, 1900 La Plata, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-3960-080X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactobacilli are generally regarded as safe; however, certain strains have been associated with cases of infection. Our workgroup has already assessed many functional properties of Lactobacillus kefiri, but parameters regarding safety must be studied before calling them probiotics. In this work, safety aspects and antimicrobial activity of L. kefiri strains were studied. None of the L. kefiri strains tested caused α- or β-hemolysis. All the strains were susceptible to tetracycline, clindamycin, streptomycin, ampicillin, erythromycin, kanamycin, and gentamicin; meanwhile, two strains were resistant to chloramphenicol. On the other hand, all L. kefiri strains were able to inhibit both Gram(+) and Gram(-) pathogens. Regarding the in vitro results, L. kefiri CIDCA 8348 was selected to perform in vivo studies. Mice treated daily with an oral dose of 10(8) CFU during 21 days showed no signs of pain, lethargy, dehydration, or diarrhea, and the histological studies were consistent with those findings. Moreover, no differences in proinflammatory cytokines secretion were observed between treated and control mice. No translocation of microorganisms to blood, spleen, or liver was observed. Regarding these findings, L. kefiri CIDCA 8348 is a microorganism isolated from a dairy product with a great potential as probiotic for human or animal use.

Indexed as

AnimalsCultured Milk ProductsGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansLactobacillusMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID24955346
PMCPMC4052788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.