Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24955301›Full record

ArticleNatural products and bioprospecting2014

Differential effect of artemisinin against cancer cell lines.

Mounir Tilaoui, Hassan Ait Mouse, Abdeslam Jaafari, Abdelmajid Zyad

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Natural products and bioprospecting, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. American journal of cancer research · 2024
    Review
  4. Dichloromethane fractions ofMolecular medicine reports · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Research Advances on Health Effects of EdibleFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mounir TilaouiLaboratory of Biological Engineering, Natural Substances, Cellular and Molecular Immuno-pharmacology, Immunobiology of Cancer Cells Cluster, Faculty of Science and Technology, P. Box 523, 23000 Béni-Mellal, Morocco.
Hassan Ait MouseLaboratory of Biological Engineering, Natural Substances, Cellular and Molecular Immuno-pharmacology, Immunobiology of Cancer Cells Cluster, Faculty of Science and Technology, P. Box 523, 23000 Béni-Mellal, Morocco.
Abdeslam JaafariLaboratory of Biological Engineering, Natural Substances, Cellular and Molecular Immuno-pharmacology, Immunobiology of Cancer Cells Cluster, Faculty of Science and Technology, P. Box 523, 23000 Béni-Mellal, Morocco.
Abdelmajid ZyadLaboratory of Biological Engineering, Natural Substances, Cellular and Molecular Immuno-pharmacology, Immunobiology of Cancer Cells Cluster, Faculty of Science and Technology, P. Box 523, 23000 Béni-Mellal, Morocco.
Laboratory of Molecular Genetics · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aims at defining the differential cytotoxicity effect of artemisinin toward P815 (murin mastocytoma) and BSR (kidney adenocarcinoma of hamster) cell lines. Cytotoxicity was measured by the growth inhibition using MTT assay. These in vitro cytotoxicity studies were complemented by the determination of apoptotic DNA fragmentation and Annexin V- streptavidin-FITC assay. Furthermore, we examined the in vitro synergism between artemisinin and the chemotherapeutic drug, vincristin. The in vivo study was investigated using the DBA2/P815 (H2d) mouse model. While artemisinin acted on both tumor cell lines, P815 was much more sensitive to this drug than BSR cells, as revealed by the respective IC50 values (12 µM for P815 and 52 µM for BSR cells). On another hand, and interestingly, apoptosis was induced in P815 but not induced in BSR. These data, reveal an interesting differential cytotoxic effect, suggesting the existence of different molecular interactions between artemisinin and the studied cell lines. In vivo, our results clearly showed that the oral administration of artemisinin inhibited solid tumor development. Our study demonstrates that artemisinin caused differential cytotoxic effects depending not only on the concentration and time of exposure but also on the target cells.

Indexed as

Antitumor activityApoptosis/necrosisArtemisininCytotoxicitySynergism

Identifiers

PMID24955301
PMCPMC4050314
OpenAlexW1976605766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.