ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2014
Comparison of different ovarian hyperstimulation protocols efficacy in poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimal selection of ovarian stimulation protocol for infertile women with diminished ovarian reserve based on Bologna and POSEIDON criteria: a network meta-analysis.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2026Pooled it
- Luteal phase stimulation versus follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian responders: results of a randomized controlled trial.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2020Trial
- Does the "delayed start" protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist improve the pregnancy outcome in Bologna poor responders? a randomized clinical trial.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2018Trial
- Article
- Effect of repeated controlled ovarian stimulation on pregnancy outcomes in fresh embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Effect of body mass index on pregnancy outcomes in young women with low-prognosis POSEIDON criteria after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- Maternal age and progesterone levels at trigger day as independent predictors of clinical pregnancy in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF/ICSI: a retrospective analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Comparison of luteal phase stimulation with follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian response: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2024Article
- The type of COVID-19 vaccination does not affect reproductive function and pregnancy outcomes in infertile couples.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Flexible Antagonist versus Agonist Flare Protocol in Women above 40 Undergoing IVF, A retrospective Cohort Study.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2023Article
- The POSEIDON stratification - moving from poor ovarian response to low prognosis.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2021Review
- Reproductive Outcomes of Single Embryo Transfer in Women with Previous Cesarean Section.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2021Article
- Determining Diagnostic Criteria of Unexplained Recurrent Implantation Failure: A Retrospective Study of TwoFrontiers in endocrinology · 2021Article
- Risk Factors of Recurrent Ectopic Pregnancy in Patients Treated WithFrontiers in endocrinology · 2020Article
- Luteal Phase Ovarian Stimulation May Improve Oocyte Retrieval and Oocyte Quality in Poor Ovarian Responders Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: Preliminary Results from a Single-Center Prospective Pilot Study.Advances in therapy · 2018Article
- Defining Low Prognosis Patients Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology: POSEIDON Criteria-The Why.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2018Review
- Influence of endometrial thickness on treatment outcomes following in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2017Article
- Amphiregulin mediates hCG-induced StAR expression and progesterone production in human granulosa cells.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Comparison Pregnancy Outcomes Between Minimal Stimulation Protocol and Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocols in Poor Ovarian Responders.Journal of family & reproductive health · 2016Article
- Diminished ovarian reserve in the United States assisted reproductive technology population: diagnostic trends among 181,536 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System.Fertility and sterility · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many protocols have been proposed to improve IVF outcomes for poor ovarian responders. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between age, ovarian hyperstimulation protocol and IVF/ICSI outcomes in poor ovarian responder (POR) according to the Bologna criteria, and to compare the efficacy of different protocols used in PORs undergoing IVF/ICSI. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 4875 IVF/ICSI cycles, including 592 cycles of women diagnosed with POR according to Bologna criteria. We explored the association of age, different types of ovarian hyperstimulation protocols and prevalence of POR, IVF/ICSI outcomes. Age, basic FSH, AFC, and as well as ovarian hyperstimulation protocols, were all associated with POR. Irrespective of age, PORs in different ovarian hyperstimulation protocol groups had similar AFC, basic sex hormones, number of retrieved oocyte, implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate as well. However, PORs treated with mild stimulation protocol used least doses of gonadotropins and shortest days of stimulation compared with those treated with other protocols (P<.05). The current study has shown that age, basic FSH, AFC and ovarian stimulation protocols patients used are all significantly associated with POR according to the Bologna criteria. It seems that there is no difference in clinical outcomes such as clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate and spontaneous abortion rate between different protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24955194PMC4057873W1658095195What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.