Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24955186›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2014

Comparison of the performance of TK system with LJ and MGIT methods in the diagnosis of tuberculosis.

Bahadir Feyzioglu, Metin Dogan, Ozlem O Sanli, Mehmet Ozdemir, Mahmut Baykan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Medium matters: modeling the impact of solid medium performance on tuberculosis trial sample size requirements.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bahadir FeyziogluDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Meram Medicine of Faculty, Necmettin Erbakan University Konya, Turkey.
Metin DoganDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Meram Medicine of Faculty, Necmettin Erbakan University Konya, Turkey.
Ozlem O SanliDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Meram Medicine of Faculty, Necmettin Erbakan University Konya, Turkey.
Mehmet OzdemirDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Meram Medicine of Faculty, Necmettin Erbakan University Konya, Turkey.
Mahmut BaykanDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Meram Medicine of Faculty, Necmettin Erbakan University Konya, Turkey.
Necmettin Erbakan University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis is a common infectious disease caused by various strains of mycobacteria, usually Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB). Various liquid or solid media are used for the diagnosis of tuberculosis. TK Rapid Mycobacterial Culture System has been developed recently. In our study, we aimed to compare TK Rapid Mycobacterial Culture System with LJ and MGIT systems in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. 200 clinical specimens (152 sputum, 41 Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL), 4 gastric aspirations, 2 urine and 1 wound) obtained from 192 patients from different clinics were included for the diagnosis of TB. All specimens were decontaminated by using the same-common procedure in all the methods. The obtained sediment was used for inoculation for the BACTEC MGIT 960, TK and LJ. Additionally, smears were prepared from the residual suspension for Ehrlich-Ziehl-Neelsen (EZN) staining for microscopic examination. Contamination was observed in 23 sputum and 4 BAL samples. Contamination rates for TK, LJ, and BACTEC MGIT 960 systems were determined as 3 (1.5%), 13 (6.5%), and 18 (9%) respectively. Mycobacterium tuberculosis growth was determined as 15 (7.5%), 14 (7%) and 13 (6.5%) by TK culture system, MGIT and LJ, respectively. In our study, the total mean detection times of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by the LJ, TK, and MGIT method were 20.1, 17.1, and 8.3 days, respectively. TK system showed a dramatically lower contamination rate than the others. There was no difference in growth rates for each of the three methods. We concluded that the TK culture system is disadvantageous in terms of turnaround time.

Indexed as

BACTEC MGIT 960 systemMycobacterium tuberculosisTK system

Identifiers

PMID24955186
PMCPMC4057865
OpenAlexW2242292694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.