ArticlePersonalized medicine2013
Genetics patients' perspectives on clinical genomic testing.
Article in Personalized medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Genetic Variants and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: A Systematic Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017Pooled it
- Patient preferences for massively parallel sequencing genetic testing of colorectal cancer risk: a discrete choice experiment.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2018Trial
- Clinical Utility of Germline Whole-Exome Sequencing Beyond Multigene Panels in Hereditary Cancer.Genes · 2026Review
- Point of Care Testing, Rapid Next Generation Sequencing and Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric and Neonatal Healthcare: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The Polygenic Nature of Multiple Sclerosis: Genetic Variants, Immunological Modulation, and Environmental Connections.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2025Review
- Experiences across a genetic screening and testing programme pathway: a qualitative study of mammogram patient perspectives.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Adolescents' and Parents' Perspectives on a Novel Decision-Making Process for Return of Results in Genomic Research.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2023Article
- ERS International Congress 2022: highlights from the Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Assembly.ERJ open research · 2023Review
- A personalized genomic results e-booklet, co-designed and pilot-tested by families.PEC innovation · 2022Article
- "…This Has to Do With My Identity. And I Don't Want to Make it Totally Transparent." Identity Relevance in the Attitudes of Affected People and Laypersons to the Handling of High-Throughput Genomic Data.Frontiers in sociology · 2020Article
- Much ado about nothing: A qualitative study of the experiences of an average-risk population receiving results of exome sequencing.Journal of genetic counseling · 2019Article
- Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes Concerning Genetic Testing Among Young Jordanians.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2019Article
- Adolescent and Parental Attitudes About Return of Genomic Research Results: Focus Group Findings Regarding Decisional Preferences.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2018Article
- Integrating exome sequencing into a diagnostic pathway for epileptic encephalopathy: Evidence of clinical utility and cost effectiveness.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2018Article
- Discussing molecular testing in oncology care: Comparing patient and physician information preferences.Cancer · 2017Article
- Risk for Patient Harm in Canadian Genetic Counseling Practice: It's Time to Consider Regulation.Journal of genetic counseling · 2017Article
- Participants and Study Decliners' Perspectives About the Risks of Participating in a Clinical Trial of Whole Genome Sequencing.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2016Article
- "Not Tied Up Neatly with a Bow": Professionals' Challenging Cases in Informed Consent for Genomic Sequencing.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Attitudes towards the sharing of genetic information with at-risk relatives: results of a quantitative survey.Human genetics · 2016Article
- When Participants in Genomic Research Grow Up: Contact and Consent at the Age of Majority.The Journal of pediatrics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsAdvances in next-generation sequencing technologies make it possible to envisage multiple contexts in which genomic tools might be used to enhance patient care. We describe how genetics patients and their caregivers view the promises and perils of clinical genomic testing. PATIENTS &
methodsFifty-one interviews with patients and parents of pediatric patients seeking genetic evaluation at an academic medical center.
resultsThemes from interviews include participants' enthusiasm for clinical genomic testing for diagnostic purposes, medical benefits and concerns about emotional and psychosocial burdens resulting from clinical genomic testing.
conclusionBy clarifying these patients' and caregivers' views of clinical genomic testing, the findings we report can help to anticipate other patients' reactions to new forms of personalized medicine enabled by genomic technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.