ArticleProceedings of the ... American Control Conference. American Control Conference2010
Modeling-error robustness of a viral-load preconditioning strategy for HIV treatment switching.
Article in Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference. American Control Conference, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robust closed-loop minimal sampling method for HIV therapy switching strategies.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2012Article
- Nonlinear observer output-feedback MPC treatment scheduling for HIV.Biomedical engineering online · 2011Article
- Controlling the Evolution of Resistance.Journal of process control · 2011Article
- Article
- Approximate-model closed-loop minimal sampling method for HIV viral-load minima detection.Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference. American Control Conference · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In previous work, we have developed optimal-control based approaches that seek to minimize the risk of subsequent virological failure by "pre-conditioning" the viral load during therapy switches. In this paper, we use Monte-Carlo methods to evaluate the sensitivity of an open-loop implementation of these approaches to modeling errors. To account for hidden parameter dependencies, we use parameter distributions obtained from the convergence of Bayesian parameter estimation techniques applied to sets of clinical data obtained during serial therapy interruptions as the distribution from which the Monte-Carlo method samples.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.