ArticleLanguage and cognitive processes2014
Never Seem to Find the Time: Evaluating the Physiological Time Course of Visual Word Recognition with Regression Analysis of Single Item ERPs.
Article in Language and cognitive processes, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Noun imageability and the processing of sensory-based information.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024Article
- A predictive coding model of the N400.Cognition · 2024Article
- Determinants of multimodal fake review generation in China's E-commerce platforms.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Individual word representations dissociate from linguistic context along a cortical unimodal to heteromodal gradient.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Context-based facilitation of semantic access follows both logarithmic and linear functions of stimulus probability.Journal of memory and language · 2022Article
- Using electrophysiological correlates of early semantic priming to test models of reading aloud.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Age-related Changes in the Structure and Dynamics of the Semantic Network.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Connecting and considering: Electrophysiology provides insights into comprehension.Psychophysiology · 2022Article
- Increased Neural Efficiency in Visual Word Recognition: Evidence from Alterations in Event-Related Potentials and Multiscale Entropy.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Multiple routes to word recognition: evidence from event-related potentials.Psychological research · 2021Article
- Word Detection in Individual Subjects Is Difficult to Probe With Fast Periodic Visual Stimulation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Co-registration of eye movements and neuroimaging for studying contextual predictions in natural reading.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2020Article
- (Early) context effects on event-related potentials over natural inputs.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2020Article
- Electrophysiological responses of relatedness to consecutive word stimuli in relation to an actively recollected target word.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Deaf readers benefit from lexical feedback during orthographic processing.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Tracking the time course of letter visual-similarity effects during word recognition: A masked priming ERP investigation.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2019Article
- Neural evidence for Bayesian trial-by-trial adaptation on the N400 during semantic priming.Cognition · 2019Article
- Parafoveal previews and lexical frequency in natural reading: Evidence from eye movements and fixation-related potentials.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2019Article
- Individual Differences in Reading Speed are Linked to Variability in the Processing of Lexical and Contextual Information: Evidence from Single-trial Event-related Brain Potentials.Word (New York, N.Y. : 1945) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual word recognition is a process that, both hierarchically and in parallel, draws on different types of information ranging from perceptual to orthographic to semantic. A central question concerns when and how these different types of information come online and interact after a word form is initially perceived. Numerous studies addressing aspects of this question have been conducted with a variety of techniques (e.g., behavior, eye-tracking, ERPs), and divergent theoretical models, suggesting different overall speeds of word processing, have coalesced around clusters of mostly method-specific results. Here, we examine the time course of influence of variables ranging from relatively perceptual (e.g., bigram frequency) to relatively semantic (e.g., number of lexical associates) on ERP responses, analyzed at the single item level. Our results, in combination with a critical review of the literature, suggest methodological, analytic, and theoretical factors that may have led to inconsistency in results of past studies; we will argue that consideration of these factors may lead to a reconciliation between divergent views of the speed of word recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.