Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24954943›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2014

A reflective teaching challenge to motivate educational innovation.

Roger A Edwards, Jennifer Kirwin, Michael Gonyeau, S James Matthews, Jason Lancaster, Margarita DiVall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Self-Help for the Pharmacy Educator.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2018
    Review
  6. Faculty development: who, what, why, where, when, and how?American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Roger A EdwardsDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts ; Department of Health Sciences, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jennifer KirwinDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael GonyeauDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
S James MatthewsDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jason LancasterDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Margarita DiVallDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe a teaching challenge intended to increase faculty use of evidence-based and student-centered instructional strategies in the demanding school of pharmacy context with technology-savvy students.

designA teaching challenge was created that required faculty members to incorporate a "new-to-you" innovative teaching method in a class, course, or experiential activity. The method was linked to at least 1 of 7 evidence-based principles for effective teaching. Faculty members were exposed to colleagues' teaching strategies via brief voluntary presentations at department meetings. ASSESSMENT: A post-challenge survey provided assessment data about the challenge. Responses to a baseline survey provided additional information about what faculty members were already doing (52% response rate). Eighty-one percent of faculty respondents completed the challenge. A wide array of new strategies (13 categories such as flipped classrooms and social media) was implemented and 75% included the use of technology. Nearly all respondents (96%) thought that participation in the challenge was worth the effort and planned to participate again the following year. All faculty members intended to continue using their new strategy and 56% planned additional modifications with future implementations. The challenge demonstrated how multiple goals of curricular improvement, faculty development, and student-centered instruction could be achieved together.

conclusionThe teaching challenge motivated most of the faculty members to try something new to them. Links between evidence-based principles and day-to-day activities were strengthened. The new-to-you design placed the challenge within reach of faculty members regardless of their background, subject, or experience.

Indexed as

FacultyStudents, PharmacyCurriculumData CollectionEducation, PharmacyEvidence-Based PracticeHumansMotivationStaff DevelopmentTeachingfaculty developmentfaculty surveyreflective teaching challengeteaching innovation

Identifiers

PMID24954943
PMCPMC4064480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.