ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2014
Engaging external senior faculty members as faculty mentors.
Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of faculty development programs based on the Harden teacher's role framework model.BMC medical education · 2023Pooled it
- Identifying Components of Success Within Health Sciences-Focused Mentoring Programs Through a Review of the Literature.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2019Pooled it
- Mentoring as an Appropriate Strategy for Medical Faculty Member Development in Higher Education: A Systematic Review.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2023Review
- Qualitative Evaluation of a Junior Faculty Team Mentoring Program.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2021Article
- Administration and Evaluation of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Curriculum Quality Surveys in Pharmacy Schools.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2021Article
- The Power of Peer Mentoring to Support Women Pharmacy Faculty Personally and Professionally.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2021Article
- Positioning global pharmacy research partnerships to advance health equity.Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP · 2020Article
- Report of the 2018-2019 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2019Article
- Identification and Development of Items Comprising Organizational Citizenship Behaviors Among Pharmacy Faculty.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2016Article
- An Analysis of Community Pharmacy Shared Faculty Members' Contributions to Teaching, Service, and Scholarship.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2016Article
- Teaching Certificate Program Participants' Perceptions of Mentor-Mentee Relationships.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2016Article
- Reframing our pursuit of life balance.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2015Article
- Faculty development: who, what, why, where, when, and how?American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2014Article
- Article
- Academic Mentorship Builds a Pathology Community.Academic pathologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A small nonprofit private college with limited resources and a high proportion of junior faculty developed a nontraditional external faculty mentor program in the summer of 2011 in response to the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) faculty survey data regarding the professional development needs of pharmacy faculty members. Experienced faculty members with national reputations from other colleges and schools of pharmacy were hired as consultants to serve as mentors for assigned faculty members. Program goals were to provide directed, individual mentorship for pharmacy practice and basic science faculty members, expand peer review of faculty teaching prowess, and enhance monthly faculty development programming. The latter was based upon the specific needs assessment of the faculty. Program outcomes reported will include faculty satisfaction (AACP faculty survey data) changes over time, achievement of board certification for clinical faculty members and other credentialing, and other benchmarks, eg, publications, grant funding, service engagement (site development, professional organizations), after the implementation of the nontraditional faculty-mentoring program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.