ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2014
CMR in patients with severe myocarditis: diagnostic value of quantitative tissue markers including extracellular volume imaging.
Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
91 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic Value of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance T1 and T2 Mapping in Acute Myocarditis: A Systematic Literature Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Pooled it
- The effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on cardiac structure and function using cardiac magnetic resonance: a meta-analysis of clinical studies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Pooled it
- Detection of acute myocarditis using T1 and T2 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021Pooled it
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance native TJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2020Pooled it
- Point estimate and reference normality interval of MRI-derived myocardial extracellular volume in healthy subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2019Pooled it
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in acute myocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2019Pooled it
- Diagnostic Performance of Extracellular Volume, Native T1, and T2 Mapping Versus Lake Louise Criteria by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Detection of Acute Myocarditis: A Meta-Analysis.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2018Pooled it
- Native TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2018Pooled it
- Post-viral myocarditis.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Establishing T1 and ECV mapping based nomogram differentiate acute ischemic and nonischemic myocardial injury: a proof-of-concept study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Multimodal Imaging in MI with Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries: Unraveling Pathophysiology and Guiding Management.US cardiology · 2026Review
- Observational
- Diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance parametric mapping as per modified Lake Louise Criteria in acute myocarditis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Article
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance to Reclassify Diagnosis and Detect Cardiomyopathies in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Presentation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Diagnosing acute myocarditis in the emergency department-advancing cardiac MRI with a focus on low-field MR applications.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Review
- T1-relaxation times along the corticospinal tract as a diagnostic marker in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2025Article
- Serum Concentrations of Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 and Procollagen Type I Carboxy Terminal Propeptide Discriminate Infarct-Like Myocarditis and Non-ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Cardiac MRI TRadiology advances · 2024Article
- Advances in the diagnosis of myocarditis in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: an overview of diagnostic tests.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2024Review
- Review
31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study evaluated the accuracy of T2, T1, and extracellular volume (ECV) quantification as novel quantitative tissue markers in comparison with standard "Lake-Louise" cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) criteria to diagnose myocarditis.
backgroundNovel approaches using T2 and T1 mapping may overcome the limitations of signal intensity-based parameters, which would potentially result in a better diagnostic accuracy compared with standard CMR techniques in suspected myocarditis.
methodsCMR was performed in 104 patients with myocarditis and 21 control subjects at 1.5-T. Patients with myocarditis underwent CMR 2 weeks (interquartile range: 1 to 7 weeks) after presentation with new-onset heart failure (n = 66) or acute chest pain (n = 38). T2 and T1 mapping were implemented into a standard protocol including T2-weighted (T2w), early gadolinium enhancement (EGE) CMR, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) CMR. T2 quantification was performed using a free-breathing, navigator-gated multiecho sequence. T1 quantification was performed using the modified Look-Locker inversion recovery sequence before and after administration of 0.075 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine. T2, T1, and ECV maps were generated using a plug-in for the OsiriX software (Pixmeo, Bernex, Switzerland) to calculate mean global myocardial T2, T1, and ECV values.
resultsThe diagnostic accuracies of conventional CMR were 70% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 61% to 77%) for T2w CMR, 59% (95% CI: 56% to 73%) for EGE, and 67% (95% CI: 59% to 75%) for LGE. The diagnostic accuracies of mapping techniques were 63% (95% CI: 53% to 73%) for myocardial T2, 69% (95% CI: 60% to 76%) for native myocardial T1, and 76% (95% CI: 68% to 82%) for global myocardial ECV. The diagnostic accuracy of CMR was significantly improved to 90% (95% CI: 84% to 95%) by a stepwise approach, using the presence of LGE and myocardial ECV ≥27% as diagnostic criteria, compared with 79% (95% CI: 71% to 85%; p = 0.0043) for the Lake-Louise criteria.
conclusionsIn patients with clinical evidence for subacute, severe myocarditis, ECV quantification with LGE imaging significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of CMR compared with standard Lake-Louise criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24954462What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.