Trial reportYonsei medical journal2014
Different location of triaxial accelerometer and different energy expenditures.
Trial report in Yonsei medical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Consumer-Based Wearable Activity Trackers Increase Physical Activity Participation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Pooled it
- Energy Expenditure Estimation of Tabata by Combining Acceleration and Heart Rate.Frontiers in public health · 2021Trial
- Baseline Clinical and Biomarker Characteristics of Biobank Innovations for Chronic Cerebrovascular Disease With Alzheimer's Disease Study: BICWALZS.Psychiatry investigation · 2022Article
- Modeling Brain Volume Using Deep Learning-Based Physical Activity Features in Patients With Dementia.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Article
- Associations of rest-activity patterns with amyloid burden, medial temporal lobe atrophy, and cognitive impairment.EBioMedicine · 2020Article
- Feasibility of the Energy Expenditure Prediction for Athletes and Non-Athletes from Ankle-Mounted Accelerometer and Heart Rate Monitor.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Analyzing walking speeds with ankle and wrist worn accelerometers in a cohort with myotonic dystrophy.Disability and rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Estimating Physical Activity in Children Aged 8-11 Years Using Accelerometry: Contributions From Fundamental Movement Skills and Different Accelerometer Placements.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Article
- Estimating physical activity in youth using an ankle accelerometer.Journal of sports sciences · 2018Article
- The effects of objectively measured physical activity and fitness on fear of falling among Korean older women.Journal of exercise rehabilitation · 2016Article
- Criterion validity and reliability of a smartphone delivered sub-maximal fitness test for people with type 2 diabetes.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2016Article
- Comparison of energy expenditure during the Y-balance test in older adults with different visual acuities.Journal of physical therapy science · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe performed a study to determine the best appropriate wearing site of a triaxial accelerometer at different exercise speeds. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted an observational study with 66 healthy Korean adults (26 men and 40 women). Resting metabolic rate (RMR) before exercise, physical activity-related energy expenditure (PAEE) by cardiorespiratory gas analyzer and Signal Vector Magnitude (SVM) were measured while wearing four triaxial accelerometers on four different sites (wrist, waist, upper arm, and ankle) at exercise speeds from 2-10 km/h.
resultsThe mean RMR was 4.03 mL/kg/min and Actual METs (oxygen consumption at different exercise speeds divided by individual RMR) compared with the calculated METs (oxygen consumption divided by 3.5 mL/kg/min) showed relatively low value. The overall correlation between PAEE and SVM was highest when the accelerometer was worn on the wrist at low exercise speed (r=0.751, p<0.001), waist at a moderate speed (r=0.821, p<0.001), and ankle at a high speed (r=0.559, p<0.001). Using regression analysis, it was shown that the ankle at a low speed (R²=0.564, p<0.001), high speed (R²=0.559, p<0.001), and the waist at a moderate speed (R²=0.821, p<0.001) were the best appropriate sites.
conclusionWhen measuring the PAEE and SVM at different exercise speeds, the ankle in low and high exercise speed, and waist in moderate speed are the most appropriate sites for an accelerometer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.