Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24953964›Full record

ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2014

Attention as an effect not a cause.

Richard J Krauzlis, Anil Bollimunta, Fabrice Arcizet, Lupeng Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neuroscience needs evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  19. Refocusing neuroscience: moving away from mental categories and towards complex behaviours.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Dopamine Modulation ofFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Richard J KrauzlisLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. Electronic address: richard.krauzlis@nih.gov.
Anil BollimuntaLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Fabrice ArcizetLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Lupeng WangLaboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Funding

Visual CircuitsZIAEY000511 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI KRAUZLIS, RICHARD · 2012 to 2025
$28.3M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 EY999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA EY000511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention is commonly thought to be important for managing the limited resources available in sensory areas of the neocortex. Here we present an alternative view that attention arises as a byproduct of circuits centered on the basal ganglia involved in value-based decision making. The central idea is that decision making depends on properly estimating the current state of the animal and its environment and that the weighted inputs to the currently prevailing estimate give rise to the filter-like properties of attention. After outlining this new framework, we describe findings from physiological, anatomical, computational, and clinical work that support this point of view. We conclude that the brain mechanisms responsible for attention employ a conserved circuit motif that predates the emergence of the neocortex.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAttentionBrainDecision MakingHumansNerve NetNeural Pathwaysattentionbasal gangliadecision makinglearningperceptionsuperior colliculus

Identifiers

PMID24953964
PMCPMC4186707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.