ArticleIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro2014
Individually addressable arrays of replica microbial cultures enabled by splitting SlipChips.
Article in Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.
- Traditional fermented food microbial ecosystems oriented towards industrial standards: multi-dimensional characterization and artificial regulation.NPJ science of food · 2026Review
- The gut-tumor connection: the role of microbiota in cancer progression and treatment strategies.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Exploring the interactions between algae and archaea.Marine life science & technology · 2025Review
- High-throughput cultivation and isolation of environmental anaerobes using selectively permeable hydrogel capsules.ISME communications · 2025Article
- Advances in the isolation, cultivation, and identification of gut microbes.Military Medical Research · 2024Review
- Article
- Species-Level Taxonomic Characterization of Uncultured Core Gut Microbiota of Plateau Pika.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Isolation and Cultivation of Human Gut Microorganisms: A Review.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Reaching unreachables: Obstacles and successes of microbial cultivation and their reasons.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- A targeted liquid cultivation method for previously uncultured non-colony forming microbes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Emerging microfluidic technologies for microbiome research.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Review
- Rapid Fabrication by Digital Light Processing 3D Printing of a SlipChip with Movable Ports for Local Delivery to Ex Vivo Organ Cultures.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Innovations to culturing the uncultured microbial majority.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2021Review
- Article
- What can microfluidics do for human microbiome research?Biomicrofluidics · 2020Article
- Slip-driven microfluidic devices for nucleic acid analysis.Biomicrofluidics · 2019Review
- User-defined local stimulation of live tissue through a movable microfluidic port.Lab on a chip · 2018Article
- Sliding-strip microfluidic device enables ELISA on paper.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2018Article
- Emerging Microtechnologies and Automated Systems for Rapid Bacterial Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing.SLAS technology · 2017Article
- Physically Triggered Morphology Changes in a NovelFrontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Isolating microbes carrying genes of interest from environmental samples is important for applications in biology and medicine. However, this involves the use of genetic assays that often require lysis of microbial cells, which is not compatible with the goal of obtaining live cells for isolation and culture. This paper describes the design, fabrication, biological validation, and underlying physics of a microfluidic SlipChip device that addresses this challenge. The device is composed of two conjoined plates containing 1000 microcompartments, each comprising two juxtaposed wells, one on each opposing plate. Single microbial cells are stochastically confined and subsequently cultured within the microcompartments. Then, we split each microcompartment into two replica droplets, both containing microbial culture, and then controllably separate the two plates while retaining each droplet within each well. We experimentally describe the droplet retention as a function of capillary pressure, viscous pressure, and viscosity of the aqueous phase. Within each pair of replicas, one can be used for genetic analysis, and the other preserves live cells for growth. This microfluidic approach provides a facile way to cultivate anaerobes from complex communities. We validate this method by targeting, isolating, and culturing Bacteroides vulgatus, a core gut anaerobe, from a clinical sample. To date, this methodology has enabled isolation of a novel microbial taxon, representing a new genus. This approach could also be extended to the study of other microorganisms and even mammalian systems, and may enable targeted retrieval of solutions in applications including digital PCR, sequencing, single cell analysis, and protein crystallization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.