Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24952944›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2014

Mechanistic heterogeneity in site recognition by the structurally homologous DNA-binding domains of the ETS family transcription factors Ets-1 and PU.1.

Shuo Wang, Miles H Linde, Manoj Munde, Victor D Carvalho, W David Wilson, Gregory M K Poon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Non-continuum Nature of Eukaryotic Transcriptional Regulation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shuo WangFrom the Department of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 and.
Miles H Lindethe Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington 99210-1495.
Manoj MundeFrom the Department of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 and.
Victor D Carvalhothe Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington 99210-1495.
W David WilsonFrom the Department of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 and wdw@gsu.edu.
Gregory M K Poonthe Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Washington State University, Spokane, Washington 99210-1495 gpoon@wsu.edu.

Funding

Heterocycle Cation Recognition of the DNA Minor Groove.R01AI064200 · NIAID · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WILSON, W DAVID · 2005 to 2014
$3.4M
NIAID NIH HHS AI064200NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI064200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ETS family transcription factors regulate diverse genes through binding at cognate DNA sites that overlap substantially in sequence. The DNA-binding domains of ETS proteins (ETS domains) are highly conserved structurally yet share limited amino acid homology. To define the mechanistic implications of sequence diversity within the ETS family, we characterized the thermodynamics and kinetics of DNA site recognition by the ETS domains of Ets-1 and PU.1, which represent the extremes in amino acid divergence among ETS proteins. Even though the two ETS domains bind their optimal sites with similar affinities under physiologic conditions, their nature of site recognition differs strikingly in terms of the role of hydration and counter ion release. The data suggest two distinct mechanisms wherein Ets-1 follows a "dry" mechanism that rapidly parses sites through electrostatic interactions and direct protein-DNA contacts, whereas PU.1 utilizes hydration to interrogate sequence-specific sites and form a long-lived complex relative to the Ets-1 counterpart. The kinetic persistence of the high affinity PU.1 · DNA complex may be relevant to an emerging role of PU.1, but not Ets-1, as a pioneer transcription factor in vivo. In addition, PU.1 activity is critical to the development and function of macrophages and lymphocytes, which present osmotically variable environments, and hydration-dependent specificity may represent an important regulatory mechanism in vivo, a hypothesis that finds support in gene expression profiles of primary murine macrophages.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBinding SitesBiosensing TechniquesCalorimetryCloning, MolecularDNAKineticsMolecular Sequence DataOsmotic PressureProtein ConformationProto-Oncogene Protein c-ets-1Proto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Protein Spi-1Sequence Homology, Amino AcidSurface Plasmon ResonanceThermodynamicsDNAProto-Oncogene Protein c-ets-1Proto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Protein Spi-1Trans-ActivatorsWaterEts-1ETS Transcription Factor FamilyHydrationIsothermal Titration Calorimetry (ITC)KineticsOsmotic StressProtein-DNA InteractionPU.1Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR)Thermodynamics

Identifiers

PMID24952944
PMCPMC4118120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.