Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24952747›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2014

Inferring human population size and separation history from multiple genome sequences.

Stephan Schiffels, Richard Durbin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 577 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
577citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

577 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gene tree patterns help answer: vicariance or dispersal?bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Dynamics of mutators of arbitrary dominance in humans.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Whole-genome resequencing of 495Horticulture research · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

517 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stephan SchiffelsWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Richard DurbinWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 098051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of complete human genome sequences from populations across the world has given rise to new population genetic inference methods that explicitly model ancestral relationships under recombination and mutation. So far, application of these methods to evolutionary history more recent than 20,000-30,000 years ago and to population separations has been limited. Here we present a new method that overcomes these shortcomings. The multiple sequentially Markovian coalescent (MSMC) analyzes the observed pattern of mutations in multiple individuals, focusing on the first coalescence between any two individuals. Results from applying MSMC to genome sequences from nine populations across the world suggest that the genetic separation of non-African ancestors from African Yoruban ancestors started long before 50,000 years ago and give information about human population history as recent as 2,000 years ago, including the bottleneck in the peopling of the Americas and separations within Africa, East Asia and Europe.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanBase SequenceGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationHaplotypesHumansPopulation Density

Identifiers

PMID24952747
PMCPMC4116295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.