Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24952740›Full record

Trial reportTrials2014

Practice network-based care management for patients with type 2 diabetes and multiple comorbidities (GEDIMAplus): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Kayvan Bozorgmehr, Joachim Szecsenyi, Dominik Ose, Werner Besier, Manfred Mayer, Johannes Krisam, Christian O Jacke, Hans-Joachim Salize, Ralf Brandner, Sandra Schmitt and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Kayvan BozorgmehrDepartment of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Voßstrasse 2, Gebäude 37, Heidelberg 69115, Germany. kayvan.bozorgmehr@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Joachim Szecsenyi
Dominik Ose
Werner Besier
Manfred Mayer
Johannes Krisam
Christian O Jacke
Hans-Joachim Salize
Ralf Brandner
Sandra Schmitt
Marion Kiel
Martina Kamradt
Tobias Freund

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCare management interventions in the German health-care system have been evaluated with promising results, but further research is necessary to explore their full potential in the context of multi-morbidity. Our aim in this trial is to assess the efficacy of a primary care practice network-based care management intervention in improving self-care behaviour among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and multiple co-occurring chronic conditions. METHODS/

designThe study is designed as a prospective, 18-month, multicentre, investigator-blinded, two-arm, open-label, individual-level, randomized parallel-group superiority trial. We will enrol 582 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and at least two severe chronic conditions and one informal caregiver per patient. Data will be collected at baseline (T0), at the primary endpoint after 9 months (T1) and at follow-up after 18 months (T2). The primary outcome will be the differences between the intervention and control groups in changes of diabetes-related self-care behaviours from baseline to T1 using a German version of the revised Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA-G). The secondary outcomes will be the differences between the intervention and control groups in: changes in scores on the SDSCA-G subscales, glycosylated haemoglobin A level, health-related quality of life, self-efficacy, differences in (severe) symptomatic hypoglycaemia, cost-effectiveness and financial family burden. The intervention will be delivered by trained health-care assistants as an add-on to usual care and will consist of three main elements: (1) three home visits, including structured assessment of medical and social needs; (2) 24 structured telephone monitoring contacts; and (3) self-monitoring of blood glucose levels after T1 in 3-month intervals. The control group will receive usual care. The confirmatory primary analysis will be performed following the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. The efficacy of the intervention will be quantified using two-level linear regression stratified by type of medical treatment adjusted for baseline values on the SDSCA-G. Secondary analyses will be performed according to the ITT principle. In health economic evaluations, we will estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. DISCUSSION: We hope that the results of this study will provide insights into the efficacy of practice network-based care management among patients with complex health-care needs.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN 83908315 (ISRCTN assigned 25 February 2014).

Indexed as

Case ManagementHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePrimary Health CareResearch DesignSelf CareBiomarkersBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringClinical ProtocolsComorbidityCost-Benefit AnalysisDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2GermanyHealth Care CostsHouse CallsBiomarkersBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID24952740
PMCPMC4082294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.