Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24952638›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2014

Views of pregnant women and clinicians regarding discussion of exposure to phthalate plasticizers.

Sapna Sharma, Justin M Ashley, Alexandra Hodgson, Jeff Nisker

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05024227 (Discussion on the Effect of Nursing Education Intervention on Women's Health Literacy of Plasticizers), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05024227 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Discussion on the Effect of Nursing Education Intervention on Women's Health Literacy of Plasticizers

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taipei University of Nursing and Health SciencesRan2021 to 2022Enrolled100ConditionsEndocrine Disrupting Chemicals, Health LiteracyArmsExperimental: nursing education interventions (including e-health platform assistance)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Endocrine Disruptors and Pregnancy: Knowledge, Attitudes and Prevention Behaviors of French Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Article
  6. Perception of Environmental Risks and Health Promotion Attitudes of French Perinatal Health Professionals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sapna Sharma
Justin M Ashley
Alexandra Hodgson
Jeff NiskerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Scientist Children's Health Research Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada. jeff.nisker@lhsc.on.ca.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research RHF-100626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study explores the views of pregnant women and clinicians regarding discussion of exposure to phthalate plasticizers during pregnancy, subsequent to the 2011 Health Canada ban of certain phthalates at a concentration greater than 1000 mg/kg in baby toys. This occurred with no regulation of products to which pregnant women are exposed, such as food packaging and cosmetics.

methodsPregnant women, physicians and midwives were recruited through posters and pamphlets in prenatal clinics in Southwestern Ontario for a semi-structured interview. All interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and subjected to rigorous qualitative analysis through a grounded theory approach, supported by NVIVO™ software. Themes emerged from line by line, open, and axial coding in an iterative manner.

resultsTheoretical sufficiency was reached after 23 pregnant women and 11 clinicians had been interviewed. The themes (and subthemes from which they arose) were: Theme I-Information Provision (IA-Sources of Information, IB-Standardization, IC-Constraints, ID-Role of Government); Theme II-Risk (IIA-Significant Risk, IIB-Perceived Relevance, IIC-Reconciliation); and Theme III- Factors Influencing Level of Concern (IIIA-Current Knowledge, IIIB-Demographic Factors).

conclusionTo respond to the increasing media and research attention regarding risk of phthalates to women, and pregnant women in particular, national professional organizations should provide patient information. This could include pamphlets on what a pregnant woman should know about phthalates and how they can be avoided, as well as information to clinicians to facilitate this discussion.

Indexed as

Maternal ExposureAdultEndocrine DisruptorsFemaleHumansMidwiferyOntarioPhthalic AcidsPhysiciansPlasticizersPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareEndocrine Disruptorsphthalic acidPhthalic AcidsPlasticizers

Identifiers

PMID24952638
PMCPMC4079618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.