Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24952614›Full record

SynthesisSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2015

Occupational health of patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a systematic review.

Ottavia Guglielmi, Bernabé Jurado-Gámez, Francisco Gude, Gualberto Buela-Casal

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03517150 (Efficiency of Intraoral Appliance in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Obese Class III), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03517150 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Efficiency of Intraoral Appliance in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Obese Class III

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2016 to 2018Enrolled60ConditionsObstructive Sleep Apnea, ObesityArmsmandibular advancement device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Upper Airway Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Self-Reported Outcomes at 24 Months.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ottavia GuglielmiSleep Unit, Mind, Brain and Behaviour Research Center (CIMCYC), Granada, Spain, ottavia@ugr.es.
Bernabé Jurado-Gámez
Francisco Gude
Gualberto Buela-Casal

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this systematic literature review was to assess the impact of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) on patients' occupational health.

methodsWe selected 19 studies that dealt with issues related to job performance and productivity, absenteeism, and psychosocial health of patients with OSAS and assessed the risk of bias in their conclusions.

resultsAlthough methodologically rigorous studies are needed to confirm these findings, the results obtained suggest the existence of multiple relationships between OSAS and work limitations of patients (i.e., difficulties maintaining attention, learning new tasks, or performing monotonous tasks). The studies reviewed reached more scientifically consistent conclusions about such patients' risk of taking more days of sick leave or having work disability, particularly if they reported excessive daytime sleepiness. Very few studies have explored the relationship between OSAS and psychosocial occupational health of patients. Thus, there is a need for research to clarify these aspects of occupational medicine.

conclusionsOSAS has numerous effects on patients' occupational health, yet, in general, results should be confirmed by studies with sufficiently large samples in which OSAS is diagnosed with reliable methods and occupational variables are assessed with standardized and validated questionnaires.

Indexed as

Work PerformanceAbsenteeismEfficiencyHumansJob DescriptionOccupational DiseasesRisk FactorsSleep Apnea, Obstructive

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.