Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24952577›Full record

Trial reportActa neuropathologica communications2014

Prognostic and predictive markers in recurrent high grade glioma; results from the BR12 randomised trial.

Vincent Peter Collins, Koichi Ichimura, Ying Di, Danita Pearson, Ray Chan, Lindsay C Thompson, Rhian Gabe, Michael Brada, Sally P Stenning, BR12 Collaborators

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta neuropathologica communications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Molecular Biomarker Testing for the Diagnosis of Diffuse Gliomas.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2022
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Incorporation of biomarkers in phase II studies of recurrent glioblastoma.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Pooled it
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. High-dose salvage re-irradiation for recurrent/progressive adult diffuse glioma: healing or hurting?Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Do we really know who has anNeuro-oncology practice · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent Peter CollinsDepartment of Pathology, Division of Molecular Histopathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Vpc20@cam.ac.uk.
Koichi Ichimura
Ying Di
Danita Pearson
Ray Chan
Lindsay C Thompson
Rhian Gabe
Michael Brada
Sally P Stenning
BR12 Collaborators
University of Cambridge · GBMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C1475/A7690Medical Research Council MC_U122861383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of a range of molecular changes in the setting of a randomised trial comparing standard PCV (procarbazine, CCNU (1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea) and vincristine) chemotherapy with the standard temozolomide (TMZ) 5-day (200 mg/m2/day) schedule and a 21-day (100 mg/m2/day) schedule in chemo-naïve, high-grade glioma (non-oligodendroglial tumours; WHO (World Health Organisation) grades III and IV) patients at first progression following radiotherapy.354 samples (79.2%) from the first operation of the 447 randomised patients provided enough tumour DNA for some or all parts of the study. Genome-wide array comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH), mutation analysis of IDH1/2 and TP53 and methylation analyses of the MGMT CpG-island was done.84% of grade III tumours and 17% of grade IV had IDH1 or IDH2 mutations that conferred a better prognosis in both; MGMT methylation (defined as average value across 16 CpGs ≥ 10%) occurred in 75% of tumours and was also associated with improved survival. Both were of independent prognostic value after accounting for clinical factors and tumour grade. None of the molecular changes investigated gave clear evidence of a predictive benefit of TMZ over PCV or 21-day TMZ over 5-day TMZ although power was limited and a role for MGMT methylation could not be ruled out. Loss of 1p and 19q was seen in only 4 patients although hemizygous loss of 1p36 occurred in 20%.The findings support reports that IDH1/2 mutations and MGMT methylation can be used in addition to tumour grade and clinical factors to predict survival in patients with recurrent high grade gliomas when treated with any of the therapy regimes used.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBrain NeoplasmsChromosomes, Human, Pair 1Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19DacarbazineDisease-Free SurvivalDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Mutational AnalysisDNA, NeoplasmDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleGliomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseLomustineAntineoplastic AgentsDacarbazineDNA Modification MethylasesDNA, NeoplasmDNA Repair EnzymesIsocitrate DehydrogenaseLomustineMGMT protein, humanTemozolomideTumor Suppressor ProteinsVincristine

Identifiers

PMID24952577
PMCPMC4229733
OpenAlexW2130297408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.